The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Apparent Failure of Current Intravesical Chemotherapy Prophylaxis to Influence the Long-Term Course of Superficial Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder
Abstract
During the 4 decades since the first introduction of intravesical chemotherapy, 3,899 patients were enrolled in 22 randomized prospective controlled studies. Of these 22 studies 13 reported a statistically significant benefit of intravesical chemotherapy. With varying followup, the reported decrease in the incidence of patients with tumor recurrence averaged only 14% (range -3 to +43%). Unfortunately, long-term (5-year) studies show no decrease in the incidence of recurrent tumor. Maintenance chemotherapy has failed to improve these results and data suggest that a single early postoperative instillation may, in fact, be most effective. Among 10 studies that include progression data none showed decreased tumor progression, and overall among 2,011 randomized patients progression occurred in 7.5% of those receiving intravesical chemotherapy and 6.9% of those treated by surgery alone. Since intravesical chemotherapy has been demonstrated in animal models to be carcinogenic, these data raise the concern that intravesical chemotherapy might possibly be carcinogenic in humans. In the absence of demonstrated long-term benefit we question the advisability of routine prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials.
Simes, R. J. (1986) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1986.4.10.1529 · Cited by 747
Publication bias and clinical trials
Dickersin, K., Chan, S., Chalmersx, T. C., Sacks, H. S., & Smith, H. (1987) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(87)90155-3 · Cited by 715
Aso, Y., & Akazan, H. (2010) · Urologia Internationalis · doi:10.1159/000282409 · Cited by 219
Cited by
SYLVESTER, R. J., van der MEIJDEN, A. P. M., & LAMM, D. L. (2002) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64273-5 · Cited by 1,312
Self-citationThe Treated Natural History of High Risk Superficial Bladder Cancer: 15-year Outcome
Cookson, M. S., Herr, H. W., Zhang, Z.-F., Soloway, S., Sogani, P. C., & Fair, W. R. (1997) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1097/00005392-199707000-00017 · Cited by 549
Agrawal, M. S., Agrawal, M., Bansal, S., Agarwal, M., Lavania, P., & Goyal, J. (2007) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.07.017 · Cited by 44
The effect of photodynamic therapy on rat urinary bladder with orthotopic urothelial carcinoma
Grönlund‐Pakkanen, S., Wahlfors, J., Talja, M., Kosma, V. ‐., Pakkanen, T. M., Ala‐Opas, M., Alhava, E., & Moore, R. B. (2003) · BJU International · doi:10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04290.x · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Lamm, D. L., Riggs, D. R., Traynelis, C. L., & Nseyo, U. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 153
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1444-1450
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1980256401
- Cited by
- 186
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Apparent Failure of Current Intravesical Chemotherapy Prophylaxis to Influence the Long-Term Course of Superficial Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)67427-5
- The paper
- Lamm, D. L., Riggs, D. R., Traynelis, C. L., & Nseyo, U. O. (1995). Apparent Failure of Current Intravesical Chemotherapy Prophylaxis to Influence the Long-Term Course of Superficial Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(01)67427-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.