Cited by 423Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsRenal cell carcinoma treatmentAdrenal Hormones and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Diagnosis, Evaluation and Treatment

NG, LINDA, LIBERTINO, JOHN M.·2003·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: We describe the presenting features, imaging methods, prognosis of and treatment approach to adrenocortical carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature review of adrenal carcinoma was performed using PubMed and a review of current urology, oncology, radiology and pathology journals. RESULTS: The incidence of adrenocortical tumors has been reported to be approximately 2/1 x 10(6) population, although this value may be an underestimate due to an increase in the incidence of unexpected adrenal masses or incidentalomas in the last decade. There has been a bimodal age incidence of adrenal carcinoma with most patients 40 to 50 years old in the studies reviewed. Overall the prevalence of adrenal tumors was slightly higher in females with most presenting with Cushing's syndrome. Of the 602 adrenal tumors reviewed 62% were functional and 38% were nonfunctional. Modern day imaging, including ultrasound, computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging, have greatly improved the diagnosis and staging of adrenal carcinoma. Surgical removal of a localized tumor and absent metastatic disease were associated with improved survival. Medical therapy with mitotane and its successors in patients with metastatic disease appear to be of little benefit for improving survival. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a review of the literature we recommend that hormone levels should be determined in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients with adrenal masses. CT should be the first study done to define an adrenal mass. All solid incidentalomas greater than 5 cm. on CT or magnetic resonance imaging should be removed surgically. The best chance of survival was achieved by surgical extirpation with the value of adjuvant therapy yet to be determined.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)64023-2

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Shapiro, 1990, Contributions of nuclear endocrinology to the diagnosis of adrenal tumors. Recent results, Cancer Res, 118, 113

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 423

Metadata

Authors
NG, L., & LIBERTINO, J. M.
Affiliations
Lahey Hospital and Medical Center (US)
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2003-01
Volume
169
Issue
1
Pages
5-11
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2105268776
Cited by
423
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 25
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
Keywords
adrenocortical carcinoma, adrenal tumors, Cushing's syndrome, adrenal incidentaloma, functional adrenal tumors, adrenal imaging, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, mitotane, adjuvant therapy, surgical resection, prognosis
MeSH terms
Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms, Humans, Prognosis, Adrenocortical Carcinoma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review