Cited by 921Adrenal and Paraganglionic TumorsAdrenal Hormones and DisordersRenal cell carcinoma treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparative histologic study of 43 metastasizing and nonmetastasizing adrenocortical tumors

Weiss, Lawrence M.·1984·The American Journal of Surgical Pathology

Abstract

A series of 43 adrenocortical tumors was analyzed using nine histologic features. Mitotic activity, especially with atypical forms, and venous invasion correlated best with metastasizing or recurring tumors; however, no single criterion was useful alone. The combination of the following nine criteria was most useful in distinguishing malignant from benign tumors: nuclear grade III or IV; mitotic rate greater than 5/50 high-power fields; atypical mitoses; clear cells comprising 25% or less of the tumor; a diffuse architecture; microscopic necrosis; and invasion of venous, sinusoidal, and capsular structures. None of the 24 tumors with two or less of these criteria metastasized or recurred, while all but one of the 19 tumors with four or more of these criteria either recurred or metastasized.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00000478-198403000-00001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the initial study by Weiss, the features with the strongest association to outcome were mitotic rate >5/50 high powered field, atypical mitoses, and venous invasion; in the second study by Weiss in 1989, the strongest association with patient outcome was the mitotic rate.

    “In the initial study by Weiss, the features with the strongest association to outcome were the mitotic rate >5/50 high powered field, atypical mitoses, and venous invasion (111) and in the second study by Weiss in 1989 the strongest association with patient outcome was the mitotic rate (112).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [111]

  • The most widely used histological scoring system for ACC is the Weiss score, based on 9 histological parameters.

    “The most widely used histological scoring system is the Weiss score (Table 4) based on 9 histological parameters (scored as 0 if absent and 1 if present) (110,111).”

    From Adrenal incidentaloma (2020) · cites this paper as [111]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Weiss, L. M.
Corresponding author
Weiss, Lawrence M.
Venue
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
Published
1984-03
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
163-170
ISSN
0147-5185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039836243
Cited by
920
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 44 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 29 · 2012: 26
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The American Journal of Surgical Pathology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Adrenal and Paraganglionic Tumors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Renal cell carcinoma treatment
Keywords
adrenocortical tumors, adrenal metastasis, tumor recurrence, histologic grading, mitotic activity, atypical mitoses, venous invasion, capsular invasion, clear cells, tumor differentiation, adrenocortical carcinoma
MeSH terms
Adenoma, Adrenal Cortex Neoplasms, Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mitosis, Necrosis, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Prognosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review