The DOI matches its Crossref record.
THE CASE FOR LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The current status of laparoscopic adrenal surgery was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A current MEDLINE search revealed 308 articles pertaining to laparoscopic surgery of the adrenal gland. Based on this literature review laparoscopic surgical anatomy, current indications and contraindications, and laparoscopic techniques were identified. The role of laparoscopic surgery for various adrenal disorders, including aldosteroma, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's syndrome, incidentaloma and adrenal cancer, were evaluated. Studies specifically comparing open versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy and the financial implications of laparoscopy were evaluated. Furthermore, newer advances in the minimally invasive management of surgical adrenal disease were identified. RESULTS: Available data from multiple institutions imply that laparoscopic adrenal surgery is safe and efficacious for aldosteroma, pheochromocytoma, Cushing's disease and incidentaloma. Compared to open surgery laparoscopy provides equally effective treatment, while minimizing patient morbidity. Laparoscopic adrenalectomy is financially superior to open adrenalectomy. For adrenal cancer open surgery currently remains the treatment of choice. CONCLUSIONS: In the majority of patients with surgical adrenal disease except those with adrenal cancer laparoscopy may now be considered an established treatment modality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lenders, J. W., Eisenhofer, G., Mannelli, M., & Pacak, K. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67139-5 · Cited by 1,524
The clinically inapparent adrenal mass: update in diagnosis and management
Mansmann, G., Lau, J., Balk, E., Rothberg, M., Miyachi, Y., & Bornstein, S. R. (2004) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0031 · Cited by 781
Adrenocortical Carcinoma: Clinical Update
Allolio, B., & Fassnacht, M. (2006) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2005-2639 · Cited by 775
Assalia, A., & Gagner, M. (2004) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4738 · Cited by 308
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for adrenal masses: does size matter?
Castillo, O. A., Vitagliano, G., Secin, F. P., Kerkebe, M., & Arellano, L. (2008) · Urology · doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.019 · Cited by 70
Metadata
- Authors
- GILL, I. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 429-436
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W1981261217
- Cited by
- 235
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE CASE FOR LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65958-7
- The paper
- GILL, I. S. (2001). THE CASE FOR LAPAROSCOPIC ADRENALECTOMY. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65958-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.