Cited by 8Sexual function and dysfunction studiesUrinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchUrological Disorders and Treatments

The Influence of Anterior Root Stimulation (S2) in Deafferented Spinal Cord Injury Men on Cavernous Electrical Activity

Stief, Christian G., Sauerwein, Dieter, Thon, Walter F., Allhoff, Ernst P., Jonas, Udo·1992·Journal of Urology

Abstract

Registration of cavernous electrical activity (single potential analysis of cavernous electrical activity) was recently suggested for the diagnosis of autonomic cavernous dysfunction. For validation of this method the effect of sacral neurostimulation on cavernous electrical activity was examined. In 3 male patients with a complete spinal cord lesion (T3, T4 and T12, respectively), deafferentation was done at the S2 to S5 levels. Around the anterior roots of S2 to S5 electrodes for neurostimulation were placed. Cavernous electrical activity was recorded with an intracavernous needle electrode and with surface electrodes in the flaccid as well as in the erect states induced by neurostimulation (at 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 30 and 45 Hz., 30 v. and 0.4 msec). In all patients similar potentials compared to the normal values, as well as additional pathological potentials were recorded during flaccidity. During neurostimulation all patients achieved full erection with no or markedly decreased cavernous electrical activity to frequencies of 12, 18, 20 and 30 Hz., while to 7, 8 and, more pronounced, 45 Hz. only partial erection with ongoing cavernous electrical activity was found. Our study strongly suggests that cavernous electrical activity and, subsequently, the cavernous smooth muscle tone are dependent on autonomic input. This finding supports the hypothesis that single potential analysis of cavernous electrical activity may be valid in the diagnosis of cavernous autonomic dysfunction. Furthermore, our results suggest a possible role for single potential analysis of cavernous electrical activity in the fine tuning of erection inducing neurostimulators.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)36526-6

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The sacral anterior root stimulator can also be used to restore male sexual and reproductive function.

    “The SARS can be also used to restore male sexual and reproductive function (Stief et al., 1992; Brindley, 1995) .”

    From A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems (2005) · cites this paper as Stief et al., 1992

    The Abstract (p. 5) says the implanted stimulator could induce penile erection, and the Discussion (p. 6) reports full erections in all three men at certain stimulation frequencies. This supports restoration of an aspect of sexual function, but the paper does not establish restoration of reproductive function, such as ejaculation or fertility. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stief, C. G., Sauerwein, D., Thon, W. F., Allhoff, E. P., & Jonas, U.
Affiliations
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • From the Department of Urology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
1992-07
Volume
148
Issue
1
Pages
107-110
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2159430205
Cited by
8
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urological Disorders and Treatments
Keywords
spinal cord injury, deafferentation, erectile dysfunction
MeSH terms
Adult, Electric Stimulation, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Parasympathetic Nervous System, Penile Erection, Penis, Sacrococcygeal Region, Spinal Cord Injuries

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review