The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of recall tests on long-term retention of paired associates
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The testing effect is observed even when no corrective feedback is given (Allen et al., 1969;Carpenter & DeLosh, 2005, 2006;Kuo & Hirshman, 1996), so it cannot be attributed solely to more efficient processing of feedback in the test condition.”
From The benefit of generating errors during learning (2014) · cites this paper as Allen et al., 1969
Citations
Cites
Response learning in paired-associate lists as a function of intralist similarity.
Underwood, B. J., Runquist, W. N., & Schulz, R. W. (1959) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0044866 · Cited by 171
Reinforcement-Test Sequences in Paired-Associate Learning
Izawa, C. (1966) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1966.18.3.879 · Cited by 77
Independent variation of information storage and retrieval processes in paired-associate learning.
Estes, W. K., & Polito, F. J. D. (1967) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0024902 · Cited by 76
Self-citationAvailability and associative symmetry.
Horowitz, L. M., Norman, S. A., & Day, R. S. (1966) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0022661 · Cited by 73
Goss, A. E., Morgan, C. H., & Golin, S. (1959) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0046336 · Cited by 46
Richardson, J., & Gropper, M. S. (1964) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1964.15.2.551 · Cited by 37
Response speed changes in an Estes' paired-associate “miniature” experiment
Eimas, P. D., & Zeaman, D. (1963) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(63)80022-5 · Cited by 30
Learning during “extinction” with paired associates
Butler, D. C., & Peterson, D. E. (1965) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(65)80092-5 · Cited by 25
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–102 of 102
Testing the testing effect with advanced materials while accounting for individual differences
Redifer, J. L., Myers, S. J., Bae, C. L., Naas, A., & Scott, A. (2026) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-025-09758-z · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Allen, G. A., Mahler, W. A., & Estes, W. K.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1969-08
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 463-470
- ISSN
- 0022-5371 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2144489531
- Cited by
- 180
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 2.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- paired-associate learning, long-term retention, recall tests, stereotypy, intrusion errors, response latency, error rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
