Monotonic and nonmonotonic lag effects in paired-associate and recognition memory paradigms
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous authors have suggested that test accuracy might follow an inverted U-function of gap.
“The possibility that test accuracy might follow an inverted U-function of gap has been suggested by previous authors”
From Optimizing distributed practice (2009) · cites this paper as Glenberg, 1976
Donovan and Radosevich's conclusion that retention interval has no effect on the magnitude of the distributed practice effect is at variance with a number of individual experimental findings.
“This conclusion is at variance with a number of individual experimental findings (e.g., Balota, Duchek, & Paullin, 1989; Bray, Robbins, & Witcher, 1976; Glenberg, 1976; Glenberg & Lehmann, 1980; see Crowder, 1976, for a useful discussion).”
From Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. (2006) · cites this paper as Glenberg, 1976
Several studies involving modest time intervals ranging from minutes to days have found that memory at the final test is best for intermediate gap durations.
“Several studies involving modest time intervals ranging from minutes to days have found that memory at the final test is best for intermediate gap durations (e.g., Balota, Duchek, & Paullin, 1989;Glenberg, 1976;Glenberg & Lehmann, 1980;Young, 1966; see Cepeda et al., 2006, for a meta-analysis focused on this point).”
From Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention (2008) · cites this paper as Glenberg, 1976
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x · Cited by 2,037 · see citing works
Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis.
Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.354 · Cited by 1,888 · see citing works
Context, ambiguity, and unlearning: sources of relapse after behavioral extinction
Bouton, M. E. (2002) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01546-9 · Cited by 1,662 · see citing works
Spacing Effects in Learning: A Temporal Ridgeline of Optimal Retention
Cepeda, N. J., Vul, E., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., & Pashler, H. (2008) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02209.x · Cited by 631 · see citing works
Component-levels theory of the effects of spacing of repetitions on recall and recognition
Glenberg, A. M. (1979) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197590 · Cited by 444 · see citing works
Self-citationKarpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.704 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Hintzman, D. L. (1976) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60464-8 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
A learning theory perspective on lapse, relapse, and the maintenance of behavior change.
Bouton, M. E. (2000) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.19.suppl1.57 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Optimizing distributed practice
Cepeda, N. J., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., Wixted, J. T., Mozer, M. C., & Pashler, H. (2009) · Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1027/1618-3169.56.4.236 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
(2010) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(10)53003-2 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
The dynamics of learning and allocation of study time to a region of proximal learning
Metcalfe, J., & Kornell, N. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.4.530 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Is expanding retrieval a superior method for learning text materials?
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2010) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.38.1.116 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Logan, J. M., Castel, A. D., Haber, S., & Viehman, E. J. (2012) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-012-9090-3 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Retrieval practice over the long term: Should spacing be expanding or equal-interval?
Kang, S. H. K., Lindsey, R. V., Mozer, M. C., & Pashler, H. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0636-z · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Long-term memory. sleep, and the spacing effect
Bell, M. C., Kawadri, N., Simone, P. M., & Wiseheart, M. (2014) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2013.778294 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
A neurocognitive model of advertisement content and brand name recall
Chessa, A. G., & Murre, J. M. J. (2007) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.1060.0212 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
Distributed Learning in the Classroom: Effects of Rereading Schedules Depend on Time of Test
Greving, C. E., & Richter, T. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02517 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
“Learning over longer retention intervals seems to benefit from longer inter-study intervals (Glenberg, 1976; Cepeda et al., 2006, 2008).”
BackgroundUsing Spacing to Promote Lasting Learning in Educational Contexts: Promises and Challenges
Ebersbach, M., Lachner, A., Scheiter, K., & Richter, T. (2022) · Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie · doi:10.1026/0049-8637/a000259 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Quantitative prediction of spacing effects in learning
Reed, A. V. (1977) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80028-5 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
- Authors
- Glenberg, A. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin System (US)
- Corresponding author
- Glenberg, Arthur M.
- ORCID
- Glenberg, Arthur M.
- Venue
- Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1976-02
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-16
- ISSN
- 0022-5371 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2067727312
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 29
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- lagged effects, paired-associate learning, recognition memory, retention interval, Brown-Peterson paradigm, cued recall, retrieval cues
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
