Cited by 6Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

Quantitative prediction of spacing effects in learning

Reed, Adam V.·1977·Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0022-5371(77)80028-5

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Consolidation theory predicts that, for a given retention interval, ISI varies nonmonotonically.

    “This theory, as well as related accounts proposed by Pavlik and Anderson (2003) and Reed (1977), quite directly predicts that, for a given retention interval, ISI varies nonmonotonically; it may or may not also predict that optimal ISI increases monotonically with retention interval.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reed, A. V.
Affiliations
Rockefeller University (US)
Corresponding author
Reed, Adam V.
Venue
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1977-12
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
693-698
ISSN
0022-5371 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078528862
Cited by
6
References
20
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords
spacing effect, learning, Markov model, perceptual variability, strength distribution, verbal learning, parametric models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review