Cited by 390Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Repetition and Memory

Hintzman, Douglas L.·1976·Psychology of Learning and Motivation

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60464-8

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Substantial behavioural evidence suggests that voluntary, short-term rehearsal is not essential for spaced learning.

    “Substantial behavioural evidence suggests that this latter voluntary, short-term rehearsal is not essential for spaced learning31,34.”
  • In humans, a number of cognitive models have been proposed to explain the superiority of spaced training or practice, but no consensus has emerged as to their usefulness or generality.

    “In humans, a number of cognitive models have been proposed to explain the superiority of spaced training or practice1,30, but no consensus has emerged as to their usefulness or generality31.”

    From Computational design of enhanced learning protocols (2012) · cites this paper as [30]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hintzman, D. L.
Affiliations
University of Oregon (US)
Corresponding author
Hintzman, Douglas L.
Venue
Psychology of Learning and Motivation
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1976
Pages
47-91
ISSN
0079-7421 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1442714200
Cited by
388
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
7.73
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
repetition, memory, frequency judgment, exposure duration, input modality, spacing effect, serial position, retrieval cues, memory encoding

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review