The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Detection, quantitation, and verification of allosteric interactions of agents with labeled and unlabeled ligands at G protein-coupled receptors: interactions of strychnine and acetylcholine at muscarinic receptors.
Abstract
Novel methods of detecting and quantitating cooperative interactions between an agent and both a tritiated (muscarinic) antagonist and the endogenous agonist (acetylcholine), acting at a common (muscarinic) receptor, have been devised. In a semiquantitative protocol, binding data are transformed into affinity ratios (the ratios of the apparent affinity of the ligand in the presence of the agent to the affinity of the ligand alone), which allow estimates to be made of the potency of the agent and its cooperativity with the tritiated antagonist and with the unlabeled ligand. These parameters have been quantitated by detailed binding assays or guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate functional assays. The kinetic phenomena associated with the allosteric interactions have been exploited in two non-equilibrium binding assays, from which the affinity constants describing the allosteric interactions can be extracted. The different assay methods give quantitatively similar and internally consistent estimates of the parameters describing the cooperative interactions. Using these assays, strychnine has been found to act allosterically at muscarinic receptors. Strychnine has an affinity of approximately 10(5) M-1 at the unliganded m1, m2, and m4 receptors but is 5-10-fold weaker at m3 receptors. It is positively cooperative with N-methylscopolamine at m2 and m4 receptors and exhibits neutral and negative cooperativity with m1 and m3 receptors, respectively. With acetylcholine, it is negatively cooperative but the degree of cooperativity is relatively low (2-7-fold), particularly at m1 and m4 receptors. The methods and equations described should be useful in detecting and quantitating allosteric interactions of agents with the endogenous neurotransmitter at G protein-coupled receptors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Allosteric modulators of GPCRs: a novel approach for the treatment of CNS disorders
Jeffrey Conn, P., Christopoulos, A., & Lindsley, C. W. (2009) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2760 · Cited by 1,063
G Protein-Coupled Receptor Allosterism and Complexing
Christopoulos, A., & Kenakin, T. (2002) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.54.2.323 · Cited by 931
Ligand binding assays at equilibrium: validation and interpretation
Hulme, E. C., & Trevethick, M. A. (2010) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00604.x · Cited by 657
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: novel opportunities for drug development
Kruse, A. C., Kobilka, B. K., Gautam, D., Sexton, P. M., Christopoulos, A., & Wess, J. (2014) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd4295 · Cited by 437
Structural basis for modulation of a G-protein-coupled receptor by allosteric drugs
Dror, R. O., Green, H. F., Valant, C., Borhani, D. W., Valcourt, J. R., Pan, A. C., Arlow, D. H., Canals, M., Lane, J. R., Rahmani, R., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12595 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Lazareno, S., & Birdsall, N. J.
- Venue
- Molecular Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 362-378
- ISSN
- 0026-895X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2418775721
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection, quantitation, and verification of allosteric interactions of agents with labeled and unlabeled ligands at G protein-coupled receptors: interactions of strychnine and acetylcholine at muscarinic receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)10255-1
- The paper
- Lazareno, S., & Birdsall, N. J. (1995). Detection, quantitation, and verification of allosteric interactions of agents with labeled and unlabeled ligands at G protein-coupled receptors: interactions of strychnine and acetylcholine at muscarinic receptors. Molecular Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)10255-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.