The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ligand binding assays at equilibrium: validation and interpretation
Open accessAbstract
The focus of this review paper is factors affecting data interpretation in ligand binding assays under equilibrium conditions. Protocols for determining Kd(the equilibrium dissociation constant) and KdA(the equilibrium inhibitor constant) for receptor ligands are discussed. The basic theory describing the interaction of a radiotracer and an unlabelled competitor ligand with a receptor is developed. Inappropriate experimental design may result in ligand depletion and non‐attainment of equilibrium, distorting the calculation of Kd and KdA. Strategies, both theoretical and practical, will be given to avoid and correct such errors, thus leading to the determination of reliable values for these constants. In determining KdA from competition binding studies, two additional concepts are discussed. First, the necessity to measure an adequate specific binding signal from the bound radiotracer ligand limits the range of affinity constants that can be measured: a particular set of assay conditions may lead to an upper limit on the apparent affinity of unlabelled ligands. Second, an extension of the basic assay methodology can indicate whether the interaction between the tracer and a test ligand is mediated by a competitive or an allosteric mechanism. Finally, the review ends with a discussion of two factors that are often overlooked: buffer composition and the temperature at which the assay is conducted, and the impact these can have on affinity measurements and the understanding of drug interactions.British Journal of Pharmacology(2010)161, 1219–1237; doi:10.1111/j.1476‐5381.2009.00604.x; published online 2 February 2010 This article is part of a themed section on Analytical Receptor Pharmacology in Drug Discovery. To view the other articles in this section visit http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bph.2010.161.issue‐6
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yung-Chi, C., & Prusoff, W. H. (1973) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2 · Cited by 12,922
Guide to receptors and channels (GRAC), 5th edition
Alexander, S., Mathie, A., & Peters, J. (2011) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01649_1.x · Cited by 1,947
Drug-target residence time and its implications for lead optimization
Copeland, R. A., Pompliano, D. L., & Meek, T. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2082 · Cited by 1,464
Structure of a β1-adrenergic G-protein-coupled receptor
Warne, T., Serrano-Vega, M. J., Baker, J. G., Moukhametzianov, R., Edwards, P. C., Henderson, R., Leslie, A. G. W., Tate, C. G., & Schertler, G. F. X. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07101 · Cited by 1,344
Allosteric modulators of GPCRs: a novel approach for the treatment of CNS disorders
Jeffrey Conn, P., Christopoulos, A., & Lindsley, C. W. (2009) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd2760 · Cited by 1,063
Allosteric Modulation of G Protein–Coupled Receptors
May, L. T., Leach, K., Sexton, P. M., & Christopoulos, A. (2007) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.47.120505.105159 · Cited by 695
Do enthalpy and entropy distinguish first in class from best in class?
Freire, E. (2008) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2008.07.005 · Cited by 491
The kinetics of competitive radioligand binding predicted by the law of mass action.
Motulsky, H. J., & Mahan, L. C. (1984) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0026-895x(25)15016-5 · Cited by 414
Modification of the binding properties of muscarinic receptors by gallamine.
Stockton, J. M., Birdsall, N. J., Burgen, A. S., & Hulme, E. C. (1983) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0026-895x(25)14327-7 · Cited by 328
Self-citationLazareno, S., & Birdsall, N. J. (1995) · Molecular Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0026-895x(25)10255-1 · Cited by 263
Cited by
Photoredox-catalyzed deuteration and tritiation of pharmaceutical compounds
Loh, Y. Y., Nagao, K., Hoover, A. J., Hesk, D., Rivera, N. R., Colletti, S. L., Davies, I. W., & MacMillan, D. W. C. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9674 · Cited by 574
How to measure and evaluate binding affinities
Jarmoskaite, I., AlSadhan, I., Vaidyanathan, P. P., & Herschlag, D. (2020) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.57264 · Cited by 522
Ligand-installed nanocarriers toward precision therapy
Mi, P., Cabral, H., & Kataoka, K. (2020) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201902604 · Cited by 350
Hollmann, A., Martinez, M., Maturana, P., Semorile, L. C., & Maffia, P. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Chemistry · doi:10.3389/fchem.2018.00204 · Cited by 334
Chou, C. M., Nelson, C., Tarlé, S. A., Pribila, J. T., Bardakjian, T., Woods, S., Schneider, A., & Glaser, T. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.006 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Hulme, E. C., & Trevethick, M. A.
- Venue
- British Journal of Pharmacology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-10-27
- Volume
- 161
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1219-1237
- ISSN
- 0007-1188 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5381
- OpenAlex
- W1733847523
- Cited by
- 657
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 5.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ligand binding assays at equilibrium: validation and interpretation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00604.x
- The paper
- Hulme, E. C., & Trevethick, M. A. (2010). Ligand binding assays at equilibrium: validation and interpretation. British Journal of Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00604.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.