Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 280

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cloned somatostatin receptors: identification of subtype-selective peptides and demonstration of high affinity binding of linear peptides.

Open access
Raynor, K, Murphy, W A, Coy, D H, Taylor, J E, Moreau, J P, Yasuda, K, Bell, G I, Reisine, T·1993·Molecular Pharmacology

Abstract

The recent molecular cloning of the genes encoding three somatostatin (SRIF) receptor subtypes has allowed for the individual expression of these receptors in mammalian cells and characterization of their respective pharmacological profiles. In the present study, we have investigated the affinities of a battery of SRIF analogues to bind to SRIF receptor subtypes SSTR1 (cloned somatostatin complex), SSTR2, and SSTR3, as well as their abilities to inhibit the release of growth hormone from anterior pituitary cells in vitro. We labeled SSTR1 and SSTR3 receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary and COS-1 cells, respectively, with the metabolically stable SRIF analogue 125I-CGP 23996. SSTR2 receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary cells were labeled with the SSTR2-specific radioligand 125I-MK-678. Inhibition studies were performed using SRIF analogues of differing structures, including hexapeptide analogues similar to MK-678, octapeptide analogues similar to SMS 201-995, pentapeptide analogues similar to c[Ahep-Phe-D-Trp-Lys-Thr(Bzl)] (SA), and linear SRIF analogues. SSTR1 bound SRIF and SRIF-28 with high affinity and the peptide SA and its structural analogues with low affinity. The hexapeptides did not interact with SSTR1 at concentrations as high as 1 microM, and only a few of the octapeptides or linear peptides bound, with very low affinities. In contrast, 125I-MK-678 binding to SSTR2 was potently inhibited by the hexapeptides, octapeptides, and some of the linear compounds, whereas SA and its analogues did not bind to SSTR2. The potencies of the various SRIF agonists to inhibit growth hormone release in vitro was highly correlated with their potencies to inhibit radioligand binding to SSTR2, but not to SSTR1 or SSTR3. SSTR3 bound analogues of each class but with moderate to low affinities, with the exception of several linear peptides and one of the octapeptides. We report for the first time the binding affinities of linear analogues of SRIF, some of which display subnanomolar affinities and are highly selective for SRIF receptor subtypes. Most importantly, these studies identify several peptide analogues that are highly potent, specific, and selective for individual subtypes of SRIF receptors. Such information, coupled with the knowledge of the distribution of these receptor subtypes in normal and pathological tissues, will be critical for more specific experimental and therapeutic interventions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0026-895x(25)13664-x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 280

Metadata

Authors
Raynor, K., Murphy, W. A., Coy, D. H., Taylor, J. E., Moreau, J. P., Yasuda, K., Bell, G. I., & Reisine, T.
Venue
Molecular Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1993-06
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
838-844
ISSN
0026-895X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124330263
Cited by
280
References
0
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cloned somatostatin receptors: identification of subtype-selective peptides and demonstration of high affinity binding of linear peptides. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)13664-x
The paper
Raynor, K., Murphy, W. A., Coy, D. H., Taylor, J. E., Moreau, J. P., Yasuda, K., Bell, G. I., & Reisine, T. (1993). Cloned somatostatin receptors: identification of subtype-selective peptides and demonstration of high affinity binding of linear peptides. Molecular Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0026-895x(25)13664-x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.