Cited by 1,680Action Observation and SynchronizationPrimate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning Development

The functional role of the parieto-frontal mirror circuit: interpretations and misinterpretations

Open access
Rizzolatti, Giacomo, Sinigaglia, Corrado·2010·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

The parieto-frontal cortical circuit that is active during action observation is the circuit with mirror properties that has been most extensively studied. Yet, there remains controversy on its role in social cognition and its contribution to understanding the actions and intentions of other individuals. Recent studies in monkeys and humans have shed light on what the parieto-frontal cortical circuit encodes and its possible functional relevance for cognition. We conclude that, although there are several mechanisms through which one can understand the behaviour of other individuals, the parieto-frontal mechanism is the only one that allows an individual to understand the action of others 'from the inside' and gives the observer a first-person grasp of the motor goals and intentions of other individuals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn2805

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rizzolatti and Sinigaglia define 'action understanding' as understanding 'from the inside' as a motor possibility, rather than 'from the outside' as a mere visual description.

    “definition of 'action understanding' as understanding ''from the inside' as a motor possibility, rather than 'from the outside' as a mere visual description'”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Rizzolatti and Sinigaglia's (2010, p.265)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rizzolatti, G., & Sinigaglia, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Parma (IT)
  • University of Milan (IT)
Corresponding author
Rizzolatti, Giacomo
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2010-03-10
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
264-274
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W1994585255
Cited by
1,680
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 67 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 114 · 2017: 109 · 2016: 115 · 2015: 125 · 2014: 136 · 2013: 178 · 2012: 135
FWCI
18.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca (Universita Degli Studi Di Milano) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Università degli Studi di Parma
  • Ministero dell'Università e della Ricerca
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
mirror neurons, action understanding, action observation, social cognition, theory of mind, intention understanding, first-person perspective, primate neuroscience
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Frontal Lobe, Goals, Humans, Motion Perception, Motor Cortex, Movement, Neural Pathways, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Psychomotor Performance, Comprehension, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review