Cited by 1,990Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationPrimate Behavior and Ecology

Parietal Lobe: From Action Organization to Intention Understanding

Fogassi, Leonardo, Ferrari, Pier Francesco, Gesierich, Benno, Rozzi, Stefano, Chersi, Fabian, Rizzolatti, Giacomo·2005·Science

Abstract

Inferior parietal lobule (IPL) neurons were studied when monkeys performed motor acts embedded in different actions and when they observed similar acts done by an experimenter. Most motor IPL neurons coding a specific act (e.g., grasping) showed markedly different activations when this act was part of different actions (e.g., for eating or for placing). Many motor IPL neurons also discharged during the observation of acts done by others. Most responded differentially when the same observed act was embedded in a specific action. These neurons fired during the observation of an act, before the beginning of the subsequent acts specifying the action. Thus, these neurons not only code the observed motor act but also allow the observer to understand the agent's intentions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1106138

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Single-cell recordings in macaque monkeys demonstrate that different mirror neurons discharge when a movement is part of different end-states.

    “Single-cell recordings in macaque monkeys demonstrate that different mirror neurons discharge when a movement (e.g., grasping) is part of different end-state. Thus, when a monkey reaches for food and brings it to the mouth (e.g., for eating), different mirror neurons are activated than when the monkey places the food aside [e.g., for placing; Fogassi et al., 2005].”

    From Social cognition and the brain: A meta-analysis (2009) · cites this paper as Fogassi et al., 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fogassi, L., Ferrari, P. F., Gesierich, B., Rozzi, S., Chersi, F., & Rizzolatti, G.
Affiliations
University of Parma (IT)
Corresponding author
Fogassi, Leonardo
Venue
Science
Published
2005-04-29
Volume
308
Issue
5722
Pages
662-667
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2084336412
Cited by
1,990
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 48 · 2023: 63 · 2022: 68 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 69 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 102 · 2017: 98 · 2016: 104 · 2015: 107 · 2014: 115 · 2013: 136 · 2012: 144
FWCI
142.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
Keywords
inferior parietal lobule, action observation, motor neurons, intention understanding, action organization, grasping, neural coding, social cognition
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Electrophysiology, Food, Goals, Microelectrodes, Motor Activity, Motor Cortex, Neurons, Parietal Lobe, Psychomotor Performance, Visual Perception, Comprehension, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review