Cited by 247Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsSocial Science and Policy Research

“To be of use”: enhancing the utility of qualitative research

Sandelowski, Margarete·1997·Nursing Outlook

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0029-6554(97)90043-9

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 61 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sandelowski, M.
Affiliations
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Corresponding author
Sandelowski, Margarete
Venue
Nursing Outlook
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-05
Volume
45
Issue
3
Pages
125-132
ISSN
0029-6554 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042894828
Cited by
247
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 12
FWCI
10.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nursing Outlook (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
Keywords
qualitative research, research utility, nursing research, research applications, evidence-based practice
MeSH terms
Data Collection, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Terminology as Topic, Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review