Creating Metasummaries of Qualitative Findings
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The translation and grounded theory techniques typically cited as the method for producing qualitative metasyntheses do not lend themselves well to qualitative survey findings as they do not contain the integrating concepts or controlling metaphors upon which these techniques depend. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is to describe a process for creating metasummaries of qualitative survey findings. METHODS: This article is based on completed work in an ongoing methodological study aimed at developing a usable and transparent protocol for combining the findings in reports of health-related qualitative studies. The sample for this work included 45 published and unpublished reports of qualitative studies of HIV-positive women with findings on motherhood, 39 of which contained findings in the form of surveys of data. Almost 800 findings were extracted. These extracted findings were reduced to 93 abstracted findings, and manifest frequency and intensity effect sizes were calculated. RESULTS: Five findings had effect sizes ranging from 25-60%, with both published and unpublished reports contributing about equally to the strength of these findings. Seventy-three findings had effect sizes of <9%, 47 of them with effect sizes of only 2%. In most of these cases, only one work contained the finding and these works had generally fewer space restrictions. Four reports with few space restrictions contained 63% of the findings across all 45 reports. CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative metasummaries are useful end products of research integration studies involving reports of findings in the form of qualitative surveys, and may serve as a foundation for qualitative metasyntheses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data analysis was based on the meta-summary approach, a quantitative aggregation of qualitative findings, developed by Sandelowski.
“Data analysis was based on the meta-summary approach, a quantitative aggregation of qualitative findings, developed by Sandelowski [27].”
From Systematic review to understand and improve care after stillbirth: a review of parents’ and healthcare professionals’ experiences (2016) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Qualitative metasynthesis: Issues and techniques
Sandelowski, M., Docherty, S. L., & Emden, C. (1997) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199708)20:4 · Cited by 1,041 · see citing works
Self-citationReal qualitative researchers do not count: The use of numbers in qualitative research
Sandelowski, M. (2001) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.1025 · Cited by 887 · see citing works
Self-citationA Description of Think Aloud Method and Protocol Analysis
Fonteyn, M. E., Kuipers, B. J., & Grobe, S. J. (1993) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239300300403 · Cited by 675 · see citing works
Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Findings
Jensen, L. A., & Allen, M. N. (1996) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239600600407 · Cited by 486 · see citing works
Qualitative research and evidence based medicine
Green, J., & Britten, N. (1998) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1230 · Cited by 484 · see citing works
Finding the Findings in Qualitative Studies
Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J. (2002) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00213.x · Cited by 468 · see citing works
Self-citationPostpartum Depression: A Metasynthesis
Beck, C. T. (2002) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973202129120016 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Reembodying Qualitative Inquiry
Sandelowski, M. (2002) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732302012001008 · Cited by 297 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Challenges of Searching for and Retrieving Qualitative Studies
Barroso, J., Gollop, C. J., Sandelowski, M., Meynell, J., Pearce, P. F., & Collins, L. J. (2003) · Western Journal of Nursing Research · doi:10.1177/0193945902250034 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Self-citationAggregating Qualitative Findings: An Approach to Theory Development
Estabrooks, C. A., Field, P. A., & Morse, J. M. (1994) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973239400400410 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
“To be of use”: enhancing the utility of qualitative research
Sandelowski, M. (1997) · Nursing Outlook · doi:10.1016/s0029-6554(97)90043-9 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Self-citationEnduring love: A grounded formal theory of women's experience of domestic violence
Kearney, M. H. (2001) · Research in Nursing & Health · doi:10.1002/nur.1029 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Qualitative research and evidence-based healthcare
Popay, J., & Williams, G. H. (1998) · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · doi:10.1177/014107689809135s08 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Metasynthesis of Qualitative Research on Living with HIV Infection
Barroso, J. V., & Powell‐Cope, G. M. (2000) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/104973200129118480 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Self-citationData as representations: contextualizing qualitative and quantitative research strategies
Valsiner, J. (2000) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901800039001006 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Negotiated Validity in Collaborative Ethnography
Belgrave, L. L., & Smith, K. J. (1995) · Qualitative Inquiry · doi:10.1177/107780049500100105 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Coder training: theoretical training or practical socialization?
Hak, T., & Bernts, T. (1996) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1007/bf02393420 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Meta-analysis: A Tool for Evidence-based Practice
Acton, G. J. (2001) · AACN Clinical Issues Advanced Practice in Acute & Critical Care · doi:10.1097/00044067-200111000-00010 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
(2013) · Advances in medical sociology · doi:10.1108/s1057-6290(2013)0000015020 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The integrative review: updated methodology
Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x · Cited by 10,241 · see citing works
Qualitative Metasynthesis: Reflections on Methodological Orientation and Ideological Agenda
Thorne, S., Jensen, L., Kearney, M. H., Noblit, G., & Sandelowski, M. (2004) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732304269888 · Cited by 749 · see citing works
Self-citationHolt, N. L., Neely, K. C., Slater, L. G., Camiré, M., Côté, J., Fraser-Thomas, J., MacDonald, D., Strachan, L., & Tamminen, K. A. (2017) · International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1080/1750984x.2016.1180704 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Sandelowski, M. (2004) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732304269672 · Cited by 616 · see citing works
Self-citationBurden, C., Bradley, S., Storey, C., Ellis, A., Heazell, A. E. P., Downe, S., Cacciatore, J., & Siassakos, D. (2016) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0800-8 · Cited by 445 · see citing works
Kastner, M., Tricco, A. C., Soobiah, C., Lillie, E., Perrier, L., Horsley, T., Welch, V., Cogo, E., Antony, J., & Straus, S. E. (2012) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-114 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Ellis, A., Chebsey, C., Storey, C., Bradley, S., Jackson, S., Flenady, V., Heazell, A., & Siassakos, D. (2016) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-016-0806-2 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
“Synthesis and quantitative aggregation (meta-summary) of qualitative data [27] was used as it allows aggregation and interpretation of studies that may be excluded from Cochrane reviews.”
MethodInfluentialPollock, M., Fernandes, R. M., Becker, L. A., Featherstone, R., & Hartling, L. (2016) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/s13643-016-0367-5 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
O’Cathain, A., Thomas, K. J., Drabble, S. J., Rudolph, A., Goode, J., & Hewison, J. (2014) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta18380 · Cited by 159 · see citing works
Shakespeare, C., Merriel, A., Bakhbakhi, D., Baneszova, R., Barnard, K., Lynch, M., Storey, C., Blencowe, H., Boyle, F., Flenady, V, et al. (2019) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.15430 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sandelowski, M., & Barroso, J.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- ORCID
- Barroso, Julie
- Venue
- Nursing Research
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 226-233
- ISSN
- 0029-6562 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1972592417
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 50.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NR04907, R01NR004907)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- qualitative meta-synthesis, women living with HIV, motherhood, effect size, research integration, translation strategies, grounded theory
- MeSH terms
- Abstracting and Indexing, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Research Design, Meta-Analysis as Topic, HIV Infections, Sex Distribution, Sample Size, Patient Selection, Qualitative Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
