The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
First-Trimester down syndrome screening using dried blood biochemistry and nuchal translucency
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of free beta-hCG, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, and nuchal translucency in a prospective first-trimester prenatal screening study for Down syndrome and trisomy 18. METHODS: Risks were calculated for Down syndrome and trisomy 18 based on maternal age and biochemistry only (n = 10,251), nuchal translucency only (n = 5809), and the combination of nuchal translucency and biochemistry (n = 5809). RESULTS: The study population included 50 Down syndrome and 20 trisomy 18 cases. Nuchal translucency measurement was done on 33 Down syndrome and 13 trisomy 18 cases. Down syndrome screening using combined biochemistry and ultrasound resulted in a false-positive rate of 4.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.9%, 5.2%) and detection rate of 87.5% (95% CI 47%, 100%) in patients under age 35 years. In older patients, the false-positive rate was 14.3% (95% CI 12.7%, 15. 8%) and detection rate was 92% (95% CI 74%, 99%). For trisomy 18 screening, the false-positive rate was 0.4% (95% CI 0.24%, 0.69%) and detection rate was 100% (95% CI 40%, 100%) in younger patients, whereas in older patients the false-positive rate was 1.4% (95% CI 0. 9%, 2.0%) and detection rate was 100% (95% CI 66%, 100%). Using modeling, at a fixed 5% false-positive rate, the Down syndrome detection rate was 91%. Conversely, at a fixed 70% Down syndrome detection rate, the false-positive rate was 1.4%. CONCLUSION: First-trimester screening for Down syndrome and trisomy 18 is effective and offers substantial benefits to clinicians and patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Snijders, R., Noble, P., Sebire, N., Souka, A., & Nicolaides, K. (1998) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)11280-6 · Cited by 1,572
Cited by
Nuchal translucency and other first-trimester sonographic markers of chromosomal abnormalities
Nicolaides, K. H. (2004) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.090 · Cited by 626
Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype
Souka, A. P., von Kaisenberg, C. S., Hyett, J. A., Sonek, J. D., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.12.093 · Cited by 517
Krantz, D., Goetzl, L., Simpson, J. L., Thom, E., Zachary, J., Hallahan, T. W., Silver, R., Pergament, E., Platt, L. D., Filkins, K., et al. (2004) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.068 · Cited by 288
Self-citationRitchie, K., Bradbury, I., Slattery, J., Wright, D., Iqbal, K., & Penney, G. (2005) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00560.x · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Krantz, D.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 207-213
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2123364225
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: First-Trimester down syndrome screening using dried blood biochemistry and nuchal translucency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00881-4
- The paper
- Krantz, D. (2000). First-Trimester down syndrome screening using dried blood biochemistry and nuchal translucency. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(00)00881-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.