The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Age- and type-dependent effects of parity on urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between parity and urinary incontinence, including subtypes and severity of incontinence, in an unselected sample, with special emphasis on age as a confounder or effect modifier. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study (response rate 80%) with 27,900 participating women. Data on parity and urinary leakage, type, frequency, amount, and impact of incontinence were recorded by means of a questionnaire. A validated severity index was used. Relative risks (RR) with nulliparous women as reference were used as an effect measure. RESULTS: Incontinence was reported by 25% of participants. Prevalences among nulliparous women ranged from 8% to 32%, increasing with age. Parity was associated with incontinence, and the first delivery was the most significant. The association was strongest in the age group 20-34 years with RR 2.2 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8, 2.6) for primiparous women and 3.3 (2.4, 4.4) for grand multiparous women. A weaker association was found in the age group 35-64 years (RRs between 1.4 and 2.0), whereas no association was found among women over 65 years. For stress incontinence in the age group 20-34 years, the RR was 2.7 (2.0, 3.5) for primiparous women and 4.0 (2.5, 6.4) for grand multiparous women. There was an association with parity also for mixed incontinence, but not for urge incontinence. Severity was not clinically significantly associated with parity. CONCLUSION: Parity is an important risk factor for female urinary incontinence in fertile and peri- and early postmenopausal ages. Only stress and mixed types of incontinence are associated with parity. All effects of parity seem to disappear in older age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prevalence of symptomatic pelvic floor disorders in US women
Nygaard, I. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.300.11.1311 · Cited by 1,869
Urinary Incontinence after Vaginal Delivery or Cesarean Section
Rortveit, G., Daltveit, A. K., Hannestad, Y. S., & Hunskaar, S. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa021788 · Cited by 786
Self-citationObstetric Factors Associated With Levator Ani Muscle Injury After Vaginal Birth
Kearney, R., Miller, J. M., Ashton-Miller, J. A., & DeLancey, J. O. L. (2006) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000194063.63206.1c · Cited by 458
Differences in prevalence of urinary incontinence by race/ethnicity.
Thom, D. H., van den Eeden, S. K., Ragins, A. I., Wassel-Fyr, C., Vittinghof, E., Subak, L. L., & Brown, J. S. (2006) · Journal of Urology · doi:10.1016/s0022-5347(05)00039-x · Cited by 256
Epidemiology of prolapse and incontinence questionnaire: validation of a new epidemiologic survey.
Lukacz, E. S., Lawrence, J. M., Buckwalter, J. G., Burchette, R. J., Nager, C. W., & Luber, K. M. (2005) · International Urogynecology Journal · doi:10.1007/s00192-005-1314-5 · Cited by 131
Metadata
- Authors
- Rortveit, G.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1004-1010
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000628921
- Cited by
- 330
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age- and type-dependent effects of parity on urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01566-6
- The paper
- Rortveit, G. (2001). Age- and type-dependent effects of parity on urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01566-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.