The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Urinary Incontinence after Vaginal Delivery or Cesarean Section
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: It is uncertain whether women who deliver by cesarean section have an increased risk of urinary incontinence as compared with nulliparous women and whether women who deliver vaginally have an even higher risk. METHODS: We studied 15,307 women enrolled in the Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag (EPINCONT) study, which involved a community-based cohort. The data base for this study was linked to data from the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. We included women who answered questions related to urinary incontinence, were younger than 65 years of age, and had had no deliveries, cesarean sections only, or vaginal deliveries only. RESULTS: The prevalence of any incontinence was 10.1 percent in the nulliparous group; age-standardized prevalences were 15.9 percent in the cesarean-section group and 21.0 percent in the vaginal-delivery group. Corresponding figures for moderate or severe incontinence were 3.7 percent, 6.2 percent, and 8.7 percent, respectively; figures for stress incontinence were 4.7 percent, 6.9 percent, and 12.2 percent, respectively; figures for urge incontinence were 1.6 percent, 2.2 percent, and 1.8 percent, respectively; and figures for mixed-type incontinence were 3.1 percent, 5.3 percent, and 6.1 percent, respectively. As compared with nulliparous women, women who had cesarean sections had an adjusted odds ratio for any incontinence of 1.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.2 to 1.9) and an adjusted odds ratio for moderate or severe incontinence of 1.4 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 2.1). Only stress and mixed-type incontinence were significantly associated with cesarean sections. The adjusted odds ratio for any incontinence associated with vaginal deliveries as compared with cesarean sections was 1.7 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 2.1), and the adjusted odds ratio for moderate or severe incontinence was 2.2 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 3.1). Only stress incontinence (adjusted odds ratio, 2.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.7 to 3.2) was associated with the mode of delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of urinary incontinence is higher among women who have had cesarean sections than among nulliparous women and is even higher among women who have had vaginal deliveries. However, these findings should not be used to justify an increase in the use of cesarean sections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods in Cancer Research
Breslow, N. E. (1980) · Cited by 7,332
Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies
(1983) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0278-6915(83)90281-8 · Cited by 1,716
A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence:
Hannestad, Y. S., Rortveit, G., Sandvik, H., & Hunskaar, S. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(00)00232-8 · Cited by 1,326
Self-citationEpidemiology and Natural History of Urinary Incontinence
Hunskaar, S., Arnold, E. P., Burgio, K., Diokno, A. C., Herzog, A. R., & Mallett, V. T. (2000) · International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction · doi:10.1007/s001920070021 · Cited by 665
Self-citationEffect of vaginal delivery on the pelvic floor: A 5-year follow-up
Snooks, S. J., Swash, M., Mathers, S. E., & Henry, M. M. (1990) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800771213 · Cited by 610
Sandvik, H., Hunskaar, S., Seim, A., Hermstad, R., Vanvik, A., & Bratt, H. (1993) · Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health · doi:10.1136/jech.47.6.497 · Cited by 517
Self-citationObstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery
Wilson, P. D., Herbison, R. M., & Herbison, G. P. (1996) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09668.x · Cited by 419
Reported prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in a general practice
Jolleys, J. V. (1988) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.296.6632.1300 · Cited by 347
Age- and type-dependent effects of parity on urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study
Rortveit, G. (2001) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01566-6 · Cited by 330
Self-citationSandvik, H. (1995) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/0895-4356(94)00147-i · Cited by 238
Cited by
Cohort Profile: The HUNT Study, Norway
Krokstad, S., Langhammer, A., Hveem, K., Holmen, T., Midthjell, K., Stene, T., Bratberg, G., Heggland, J., & Holmen, J. (2013) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/dys095 · Cited by 1,127
Keag, O. E., Norman, J. E., & Stock, S. J. (2018) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494 · Cited by 909
Norton, P., & Brubaker, L. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)67925-7 · Cited by 579
Urinary Incontinence in US Women: A Population-Based Study
Melville, J. L. (2005) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.165.5.537 · Cited by 482
Parity, Mode of Delivery, and Pelvic Floor Disorders
Lukacz, E. S., Lawrence, J. M., Contreras, R., Nager, C. W., & Luber, K. M. (2006) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000218096.54169.34 · Cited by 386
Metadata
- Authors
- Rortveit, G., Daltveit, A. K., Hannestad, Y. S., & Hunskaar, S.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2003-03-06
- Volume
- 348
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 900-907
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2115601079
- Cited by
- 786
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 27.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Urinary Incontinence after Vaginal Delivery or Cesarean Section. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa021788
- The paper
- Rortveit, G., Daltveit, A. K., Hannestad, Y. S., & Hunskaar, S. (2003). Urinary Incontinence after Vaginal Delivery or Cesarean Section. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa021788
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.