The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical Chorioamnionitis and the Prognosis for Very Low Birth Weight Infants
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of clinical chorioamnionitis on neonatal morbidity and mortality in very low birth weight infants. METHODS: This was an observational cohort analysis of all singleton live-born infants weighing 500-1500 g at 24 weeks' or greater gestational age and born between 1988 and 1996 at Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, Texas. Chorioamnionitis was diagnosed on the basis of maternal fever of 38C with supporting clinical evidence, which included fetal tachycardia, uterine tenderness, and/or malodorous infant, and the absence of another source of infection. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for outcomes of interest. RESULTS: Ninety-five of 1367 very low birth weight infants (7%) were exposed to chorioamnionitis. Neonatal sepsis, respiratory distress syndrome, seizure in the first 24 hours of life, intraventricular hemorrhage (grade 3 or 4), and periventricular leukomalacia were all significantly increased with chorioamnionitis, after adjusting for preterm ruptured membranes, pregnancy-associated hypertension, cesarean birth, gestational age, and birth weight. The odds ratios for intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, and seizures in the first 24 hours were 2.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6, 4.8), 3.4 (95% CI 1.6, 7.3), and 2.9 (95% CI 1.2, 6.8), respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results suggest a link between clinical chorioamnionitis and several indices of neonatal morbidity in the very low birth weight infant. Chorioamnionitis appears to make the very low birth weight infant particularly vulnerable to neurologic damage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Yoon, B. H., Romero, R., Yang, S. H., Jun, J. K., Kim, I.-O., Choi, J.-H., & Syn, H. C. (1996) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70585-9 · Cited by 584
Cited by
Rezaie, P., & Dean, A. (2002) · Neuropathology · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1789.2002.00438.x · Cited by 332
Linder, N., Haskin, O., Levit, O., Klinger, G., Prince, T., Naor, N., Turner, P., Karmazyn, B., & Sirota, L. (2003) · Pediatrics · doi:10.1542/peds.111.5.e590 · Cited by 289
Periodontal disease and upper genital tract inflammation in early spontaneous preterm birth
Goepfert, A. R., Jeffcoat, M. K., Andrews, W. W., Faye-Petersen, O., Cliver, S. P., Goldenberg, R. L., & Hauth, J. C. (2004) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/01.aog.0000139836.47777.6d · Cited by 213
Redline, R. W. (2004) · Seminars in Neonatology · doi:10.1016/j.siny.2003.09.005 · Cited by 185
Effect of Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) on Rat Placenta Pathology and Perinatal Outcomes
Liu, Y., Wang, L., Wang, F., & Li, C. (2016) · Medical Science Monitor · doi:10.12659/msm.897808 · Cited by 106
Metadata
- Authors
- Alexander, J.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1998-05
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 725-729
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2075117224
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Chorioamnionitis and the Prognosis for Very Low Birth Weight Infants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00056-8
- The paper
- Alexander, J. (1998). Clinical Chorioamnionitis and the Prognosis for Very Low Birth Weight Infants. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(98)00056-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.