The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To quantify the risk of cesarean delivery associated with elective induction of labor in nulliparous women at term. METHODS: We performed a cohort study on a major urban obstetric service that serves predominantly private obstetric practices. All term, nulliparous women with vertex, singleton gestations who labored during an 8-month period (n = 1561) were divided into three groups: spontaneous labor, elective induction, and medical induction. The risk of cesarean delivery in the induction groups was determined using stepwise logistic regression to control for potential confounding factors. RESULTS: Women experiencing spontaneous labor had a 7.8% cesarean delivery rate, whereas women undergoing elective labor induction had a 17.5% cesarean delivery rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.89; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12, 3.18) and women undergoing medically indicated labor induction had a 17.7% cesarean delivery rate (OR 1.69; 95% CI 1.13, 2.54). Other variables that remained significant risk factors for cesarean delivery in the model included: epidural placement at less than 4 cm dilatation (OR 4.66; 95% CI 2.25, 9.66), epidural placement after 4 cm dilatation (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.06, 4.48), chorioamnionitis (OR 4.61; 95% CI 2.89, 7.35), birth weight greater than 4000 g (OR 2.59; 95% CI 1.69, 3.97), maternal body mass index greater than 26 kg/m2 (OR 2.36; 95% CI 1.61, 3.47), Asian race (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.04, 5.34), and magnesium sulfate use (OR 2.18; 95% CI 1.04, 4.55). CONCLUSION: Elective induction of labor is associated with a significantly increased risk of cesarean delivery in nulliparous women. Avoiding labor induction in settings of unproved benefit may aid efforts to reduce the primary cesarean delivery rate.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Etiology and prevention of stillbirth
Fretts, R. C. (2005) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2005.03.074 · Cited by 462
The Risk of Cesarean Delivery with Neuraxial Analgesia Given Early versus Late in Labor
Wong, C. A., Scavone, B. M., Peaceman, A. M., McCarthy, R. J., Sullivan, J. T., Diaz, N. T., Yaghmour, E., Marcus, R.-J. L., Sherwani, S. S., Sproviero, M. T., et al. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa042573 · Cited by 440
O’Leary, C., De Klerk, N., Keogh, J., Pennell, C., De Groot, J., York, L., Mulroy, S., & Stanley, F. (2007) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2007.01307.x · Cited by 118
Stimulation Therapy to Induce Mothers: Protocol for a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
Tortal, D., Shabanova, V., Taylor, S., Xu, X., McAdow, M., Stetson, B., McCollum, S., Sanchez, E., Adjakple, A., Leventhal, J., et al. (2024) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/63463 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Seyb, S.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 600-607
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013877743
- Cited by
- 322
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00377-4
- The paper
- Seyb, S. (1999). Risk of cesarean delivery with elective induction of labor at term in nulliparous women. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00377-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.