The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Direct medical cost of pelvic inflammatory disease and its sequelae: decreasing, but still substantial
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate direct medical costs and average lifetime cost per case of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). METHODS: We estimated the direct medical expenditures for PID and its three major sequelae (chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy, and infertility) and determined the average lifetime cost of a case of PID and its sequelae. We analyzed 3 years of claims data of privately insured individuals to determine costs, and 3 years of national survey data to determine number of cases of PID, chronic pelvic pain, and ectopic pregnancy. We developed a probability model to determine the average lifetime cost of a case of PID. RESULTS: Direct medical expenditures for PID and its sequelae were estimated at $1.88 billion in 1998: $1.06 billion for PID, $166 million for chronic pelvic pain, $295 million for ectopic pregnancy, and $360 million for infertility associated with PID. The expected lifetime cost of a case of PID was $1167 in 1998 dollars. The majority of those costs ($843 per case) represent care for acute PID rather than diagnosis and treatment of sequelae. Approximately 73% of cases will not accrue costs beyond the treatment of acute PID. CONCLUSION: The direct medical cost of PID is still substantial. The majority of PID related costs are incurred in the treatment of acute PID. Because most PID-related costs arise in the first year from treatment of acute PID infection, strategies that prevent PID are likely to be cost-effective within a single year.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by screening for cervical chlamydial infection
Scholes, D., Stergachis, A., Heidrich, F. E., Andrilla, H., Holmes, K. K., & Stamm, W. E. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199605233342103 · Cited by 847
Cited by
Risk of Sequelae after Chlamydia trachomatis Genital Infection in Women
Haggerty, C. L., Gottlieb, S. L., Taylor, B. D., Low, N., Xu, F., & Ness, R. B. (2010) · The Journal of Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/652395 · Cited by 657
Cost of pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the United States
Subak, L. (2001) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01472-7 · Cited by 532
The Estimated Direct Medical Cost of Sexually Transmitted Diseases Among American Youth, 2000
Chesson, H. W., Blandford, J. M., Gift, T. L., Tao, G., & Irwin, K. L. (2004) · Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health · doi:10.1363/3601104 · Cited by 444
Ness, R. B., Soper, D. E., Holley, R. L., Peipert, J., Randall, H., Sweet, R. L., Sondheimer, S. J., Hendrix, S. L., Amortegui, A., Trucco, G., et al. (2002) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1067/mob.2002.121625 · Cited by 414
Economic burden of endometriosis
Gao, X., Outley, J., Botteman, M., Spalding, J., Simon, J. A., & Pashos, C. L. (2006) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.015 · Cited by 289
Metadata
- Authors
- Rein, D.
- Venue
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Published
- 2000-03
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 397-402
- ISSN
- 0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2060717283
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Direct medical cost of pelvic inflammatory disease and its sequelae: decreasing, but still substantial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00551-7
- The paper
- Rein, D. (2000). Direct medical cost of pelvic inflammatory disease and its sequelae: decreasing, but still substantial. Obstetrics & Gynecology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0029-7844(99)00551-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.