The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Membrane Actions of Anesthetics and Tranquilizers
Abstract
A diagrammatic summary of the membrane actions of anesthetics and tran-quilizers is shown in figure 15. According to the definition of an anesthetic as a drug which directly blocks the membrane action potential, without appreciably affecting the resting potential, a wide variety of lipid-soluble compounds may be considered as anesthetics. Under conditions of general anesthesia the membrane concentration of an anesthetic is 0.003 moles/kg dry membrane, the anesthetic occupying a volume of 0.02% in the membrane phase. Under conditions of local anesthesia the membrane concentration is 0.04 moles/kg membrane, with an occupying volume of 0.3% in the membrane. The partitioning into the membrane is about 1/10 that of olive oil and about ⅕ that of octanol. These figures hold for many nerve-blocking drugs, and in order to explain differences in the in vivo action of these drugs, other factors must be considered, such as anesthetic sensitization etc. The biomembranes expand or swell about 10 times more than the anesthetic volume of occupation in the membrane, 0.4% expansion occuring under conditions of general anesthesia, and 2 to 3% expansion occuring under conditions of local anesthesia. Although the anesthetics electrically stabilize the membrane, they fluidize and disorder the components within the membrane, probably including membrane water. As a consequence of membrane expansion, membrane-associated enzymes and proteins can be either stimulated or inhibited. The pathways for facilitated fluxes of solutes across membranes are invariably depressed, presumably because of the conformation changes brought about by the membrane-expanding anesthetics; the Na+-conductance channel of the action potential appears to be one of these facilitated pathways. The anesthetic amines displace membrane-bound Ca++ and generally depress passive fluxes of cations. The neutral anesthetics generally increase membrane-bound Ca++ and generally increase the passive fluxes. The membrane fluidization may explain the enhanced neurosecretion of membrane-bound materials, by a mechanism of membrane-membrane fusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms of membrane toxicity of hydrocarbons
Sikkema, J., de Bont, J. A., & Poolman, B. (1995) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.59.2.201-222.1995 · Cited by 2,685
General anaesthesia: from molecular targets to neuronal pathways of sleep and arousal
Franks, N. P. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2372 · Cited by 1,295
The Dopamine Hypothesis of Schizophrenia: A Review*
Meltzer, H. Y., & Stahl, S. M. (1976) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/2.1.19 · Cited by 883
Seeman, P., & Lee, T. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1145194 · Cited by 869
Self-citationKönemann, H. (1981) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0300-483x(81)90130-x · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Seeman, P.
- Venue
- Pharmacological Reviews
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1972-12
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 583-655
- ISSN
- 0031-6997 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2271112592
- Cited by
- 2,246
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 112.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Membrane Actions of Anesthetics and Tranquilizers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0031-6997(25)06931-5
- The paper
- Seeman, P. (1972). The Membrane Actions of Anesthetics and Tranquilizers. Pharmacological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-6997(25)06931-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.