Cited by 102Stress Responses and CortisolAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesNeuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Comparative analysis of anxiety-like behavior in partition and plus-maze tests after agonistic interactions in mice

Avgustinovich, Damira F., Gorbach, Olga V., Kudryavtseva, Natalia N.·1997·Physiology & Behavior

Abstract

The behavior of C57BL/6J male mice with experience of repeated victories (winners) or defeats (losers) in daily agonistic interactions, was examined in the plus-maze and partition tests. The latter procedure assesses the reactivity of mice to another conspecific in the neighboring compartment of a common cage, communicative behavior or level of sociability. The behavior of mice after 10 days (T10) and 20 days (T20) of agonistic confrontations, as well as in controls (5 days of individual housing) was analyzed. Significant differences were found between T10 and T20 losers and controls in both tests. In the partition test, a decrease in the number of approaches and total and average time spent near the partition was found in T10 and, more pronounced, in T20 losers. In the plus-maze, losers showed fewer open and total entries than controls. Moreover, rarely did they pass from one enclosed arm to another, and also showed a decreased number of 'peepings' from enclosed arms. Percentage of open time did not differ significantly in losers compared to controls. It is suggested that the level of losers' sociability, estimated as low by the partition test, can include anxiety as a component, which is confirmed, at least partly, by some parameters of the plus-maze test. There were no differences in the partition or plus-maze tests between T10 winners and controls. However, all parameters of partition behavior were significantly different between T20 winners and controls. In the plus-maze…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0031-9384(96)00303-4

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A modified and abbreviated version of the sensory contact model of social defeat stress in mice, initially described by Kudryavtseva and co-workers, was introduced in 2006 by Berton et al.

    “A modified and abbreviated version of the sensory contact model of social defeat stress in mice, initially described by Kudryavtseva and co-workers10,22, was introduced in 2006 by Berton et al.17.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avgustinovich, D. F., Gorbach, O. V., & Kudryavtseva, N. N.
Affiliations
Russian Academy of Sciences (RU)
Corresponding author
Avgustinovich, Damira F.
Venue
Physiology & Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-01
Volume
61
Issue
1
Pages
37-43
ISSN
0031-9384 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2007604466
Cited by
102
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
Keywords
anxiety-like behavior, agonistic behavior, plus-maze test, sociability, winners and losers, repeated social defeat, C57BL/6J mice, open arm entries, anxiety assessment
MeSH terms
Agonistic Behavior, Animals, Animal Communication, Anxiety, Arousal, Disease Models, Animal, Dominance-Subordination, Escape Reaction, Male, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Social Behavior, Social Environment, Maze Learning, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review