The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A comparison of the interiors of Jupiter and Saturn
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Interior models of Jupiter and Saturn are calculated and compared in the framework of the three-layer assumption, which rely on the perception that both planets consist of three globally homogeneous regions: a dense core, a metallic hydrogen envelope, and a molecular hydrogen envelope. Within this framework, constraints on the core mass and abundance of heavy elements (i.e. elements other than hydrogen and helium) are given by accounting for uncertainties on the measured gravitational moments, surface temperature, surface helium abundance, and on the inferred protosolar helium abundance, equations of state, temperature profile and solid/differential interior rotation. Results obtained solely from static models matching the measured gravitational fields indicate that the mass of Jupiter’s dense core is less than 14 M⊕ (Earth masses), but that models with no core are possible given the current uncertainties on the hydrogen–helium equation of state. Similarly, Saturn’s core mass is less than 22 M⊕ but no lower limit can be inferred. The total mass of heavy elements (including that in the core) is constrained to lie between 11 and 42 M⊕ in Jupiter, and between 19 and 31 M⊕ in Saturn. The enrichment in heavy elements of their molecular envelopes is 1–6.5, and 0.5–12 times the solar value, respectively. Additional constraints from evolution models accounting for the progressive differentiation of helium (Hubbard WB, Guillot T, Marley MS, Burrows A, Lunine JI, Saumon D, 1999. Comparative evolution of Jupiter and Saturn. Planet. Space Sci. 47, 1175–1182) are used to obtain tighter, albeit less robust, constraints. The resulting core masses are then expected to be in the range 0–10 M⊕, and 6–17 M⊕ for Jupiter and Saturn, respectively. Furthermore, it is shown that Saturn’s atmospheric helium mass mixing ratio, as derived from Voyager, Y=0.06±0.05, is probably too low. Static and evolution models favor a value of Y=0.11−0.25. Using, Y=0.16±0.05, Saturn’s molecular region is found to be enriched in heavy elements by 3.5 to 10 times the solar value, in relatively good agreement with the measured methane abundance. Finally, in all cases, the gravitational moment J6 of models matching all the constraints are found to lie between 0.35 and 0.38×10−4 for Jupiter, and between 0.90 and 0.98×10−4 for Saturn, assuming solid rotation. For comparison, the uncertainties on the measured J6 are about 10 times larger. More accurate measurements of J6 (as expected from the Cassini orbiter for Saturn) will therefore permit to test the validity of interior models calculations and the magnitude of differential rotation in the planetary interior.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Abundances of the elements: Meteoritic and solar
Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. (1989) · Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta · doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x · Cited by 10,422
A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star
Mayor, M., & Queloz, D. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/378355a0 · Cited by 4,111
Formation of the Giant Planets by Concurrent Accretion of Solids and Gas
Pollack, J. B., Hubickyj, O., Bodenheimer, P., Lissauer, J. J., Podolak, M., & Greenzweig, Y. (1996) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.1996.0190 · Cited by 3,127
Stellar Structure and Evolution
Kippenhahn, R., Weigert, A., & Weiss, A. (2012) · Astronomy and Astrophysics Library · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-30304-3 · Cited by 1,989
Stellar Structure and Evolution
Kippenhahn, R., & Weigert, A. (1990) · Astronomy and Astrophysics Library · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-61523-8 · Cited by 1,556
A Nongray Theory of Extrasolar Giant Planets and Brown Dwarfs
Burrows, A., Marley, M., Hubbard, W. B., Lunine, J. I., Guillot, T., Saumon, D., Freedman, R., Sudarsky, D., & Sharp, C. (1997) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/305002 · Cited by 1,390
Self-citationAn Equation of State for Low-Mass Stars and Giant Planets
Saumon, D., Chabrier, G., & van Horn, H. M. (1995) · The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series · doi:10.1086/192204 · Cited by 1,274
Solar models with helium and heavy-element diffusion
Bahcall, J. N., Pinsonneault, M. H., & Wasserburg, G. J. (1995) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.67.781 · Cited by 873
Principles of stellar evolution and nucleosynthesis
Clayton, D. D. (1968) · Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) · Cited by 827
Metallization of Fluid Molecular Hydrogen at 140 GPa (1.4 Mbar)
Weir, S. T., Mitchell, A. C., & Nellis, W. J. (1996) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.76.1860 · Cited by 756
Cited by
Source regions and timescales for the delivery of water to the Earth
Morbidelli, A., Chambers, J., Lunine, J. I., Petit, J. M., Robert, F., Valsecchi, G. B., & Cyr, K. E. (2000) · Meteoritics & Planetary Science · doi:10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01518.x · Cited by 881
The interiors of giant planets: Models and outstanding questions.
Guillot, T. (2005) · Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences · doi:10.1146/annurev.earth.32.101802.120325 · Cited by 524
Self-citationLodders, K. (2002) · Icarus · doi:10.1006/icar.2001.6740 · Cited by 447
Perryman, M. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108304160 · Cited by 340
Initial Conditions of Planet Formation: Lifetimes of Primordial Disks
Mamajek, E. E., Usuda, T., Tamura, M., & Ishii, M. (2009) · AIP Conference Proceedings · doi:10.1063/1.3215910 · Cited by 299
Metadata
- Authors
- Guillot, T.
- Venue
- Planetary and Space Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1999-10
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 10-11
- Pages
- 1183-1200
- ISSN
- 0032-0633 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974545438
- Cited by
- 318
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 6.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A comparison of the interiors of Jupiter and Saturn. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0032-0633(99)00043-4
- The paper
- Guillot, T. (1999). A comparison of the interiors of Jupiter and Saturn. Planetary and Space Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0032-0633(99)00043-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.