Cited by 881Astro and Planetary SciencePlanetary Science and ExplorationAstrophysics and Star Formation Studies

Source regions and timescales for the delivery of water to the Earth

Open access
Morbidelli, A., Chambers, J., Lunine, J. I., Petit, J. M., Robert, F., Valsecchi, G. B., Cyr, K. E.·2000·Meteoritics & Planetary Science

Abstract

Abstract—In the primordial solar system, the most plausible sources of the water accreted by the Earth were in the outer asteroid belt, in the giant planet regions, and in the Kuiper Belt. We investigate the implications on the origin of Earth's water of dynamical models of primordial evolution of solar system bodies and check them with respect to chemical constraints. We find that it is plausible that the Earth accreted water all along its formation, from the early phases when the solar nebula was still present to the late stages of gas‐free sweepup of scattered planetesimals. Asteroids and the comets from the Jupiter‐Saturn region were the first water deliverers, when the Earth was less than half its present mass. The bulk of the water presently on Earth was carried by a few planetary embryos, originally formed in the outer asteroid belt and accreted by the Earth at the final stage of its formation. Finally, a late veneer, accounting for at most 10% of the present water mass, occurred due to comets from the Uranus‐Neptune region and from the Kuiper Belt. The net result of accretion from these several reservoirs is that the water on Earth had essentially the D/H ratio typical of the water condensed in the outer asteroid belt. This is in agreement with the observation that the D/H ratio in the oceans is very close to the mean value of the D/H ratio of the water inclusions in carbonaceous chondrites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2000.tb01518.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Impacts from comets and asteroids delivered a variety of organics to early Earth, even though they provided only a very small fraction of Earth's water budget.

    “Impacts from comets and asteroids delivered a variety of organics to early Earth, even though they provided only a very small fraction of Earth's water budget (Morbidelli et al., 2000).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Morbidelli et al., 2000

  • The idea that comets were the primary source of Earth's water has been largely discredited due to the low probability of cometary collisions with Earth and the high D/H ratio of many comets.

    “This idea has since been largely discredited due to the low probability of cometary collisions with Earth (Morbidelli et al., 2000) and the high D/H ratio of many, though not all, comets (e.g., Marty and Yokochi, 2006).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Morbidelli et al., 2000

  • No more than 10% of Earth's water was delivered by comets originating from the trans-uranian region, based on differences in observed D/H ratio between comets and Earth's current water supply.

    “No more than 10% of Earth's water was delivered by comets originating from the trans-uranian region, based on the differences in observed D/H ratio between comets and Earth's current water supply (Morbidelli et al., 2000).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Morbidelli et al., 2000

  • It is widely agreed that the primary source of water on Earth was delivery by material similar to C-type asteroids via the Grand Tack model.

    “However, it is widely agreed that the primary source of water on Earth was delivery by material similar to C-type asteroids (Morbidelli et al., 2000) via the Grand Tack model, as discussed above.”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Morbidelli et al., 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morbidelli, A., Chambers, J., Lunine, J. I., Petit, J. M., Robert, F., Valsecchi, G. B., & Cyr, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Observatoire de la Côte d’Azur (FR)
  • Armagh Observatory & Planetarium (GB)
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle (FR)
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (US)
Corresponding author
Morbidelli, A.
Venue
Meteoritics & Planetary Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-11
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
1309-1320
ISSN
  • 1086-9379 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5100
OpenAlex
W2014359877
Cited by
881
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 49 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 52 · 2013: 42 · 2012: 39
FWCI
12.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Meteoritics and Planetary Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
Keywords
origin of Earth's water, water delivery, outer asteroid belt, Kuiper belt, planetary embryos, late veneer, hydrogen/deuterium ratio, carbonaceous chondrites, water inclusions, solar nebula, planetesimal accretion, giant planet migration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review