Cited by 125Polymer crystallization and propertiesRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesPolymer Nanocomposites and Properties

The influence of molecular weight and thermal history on the thermal, rheological, and mechanical properties of metallocene-catalyzed linear polyethylenes

Jordens, K·2000·Polymer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0032-3861(00)00073-2

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jordens, K.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Jordens, K
Venue
Polymer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-09
Volume
41
Issue
19
Pages
7175-7192
ISSN
0032-3861 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034036943
Cited by
125
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 6
FWCI
5.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Polymer (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
Keywords
linear polyethylene, metallocene catalysis, molecular weight effects, thermal history, melt rheology, Carreau-Yasuda model, crystallinity, mechanical properties, tensile deformation, long spacing, alpha relaxation, beta relaxation, gamma relaxation, polymer films

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review