Cited by 279Rheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesInjection Molding Process and Properties

Melt rheology of polyolefins

Gahleitner, Markus·2001·Progress in Polymer Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-6700(01)00011-9

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 127 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gahleitner, M.
Affiliations
Borealis (Austria) (AT)
Corresponding author
Gahleitner, Markus
Venue
Progress in Polymer Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2001-08
Volume
26
Issue
6
Pages
895-944
ISSN
0079-6700 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2012956244
Cited by
278
References
127
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 21
FWCI
5.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Progress in Polymer Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes › Rheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Injection Molding Process and Properties
Keywords
polyolefins, melt rheology, thermoplastics, polymer blends, polymers, molecular weight distribution, chain structure, polymer topology, rheological characterization, phase structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review