The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global Assessment of Functioning
Abstract
The modified Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale has more detailed criteria and a more structured scoring system than the original GAF. The two scales were compared for reliability and validity. Raters who had different training levels assigned hospital admission and discharge GAF scores from patient charts. Intraclass correlation coefficients for admission GAF scores were higher for raters who used the modified GAF (0.81), compared with raters who used the original GAF (0.62). Validity studies showed a high correlation (0.80) between the two sets of scores. The modified GAF also correlated well with Zung Depression scores (-0.73). The modified GAF may be particularly useful when interrater reliability needs to be maximum and/or when persons with varying skills and employment backgrounds--and without much GAF training--must rate patients. Because of the increased structure, the modified GAF may also be more resistant to rater bias.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“* Catatan: Penyekoran berdasarkan panduan Global Assessment of Functioning dariHall (1995).”
From Narrative Therapy to Treat a College Student's Depression: A Case Report (2024) · cites this paper as Hall (1995)
In the citing paper
“Asesmen yang dilakukan terhadap Aya adalah wawancara semiterstruktur berbasis online untuk menggali informasi berdasarkan kriteria tertentu mengenai fungsi globalnya terkait psikologis, sosial, dan pekerjaan (Hall, 1995).”
From Narrative Therapy to Treat a College Student's Depression: A Case Report (2024) · cites this paper as Hall, 1995
Citations
Cites
The Global Assessment Scale: A Procedure for Measuring Overall Severity of Psychiatric Disturbance
Endicott, J. (1976) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1976.01770060086012 · Cited by 4,982
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Westermeyer, 1991, Problems with managed psychiatric care without a psychiatrist-manager, Hosp Community Psychiatry, 42, 1221
- Thompson, 1992, Initial level of care and clinical status in a managed mental health program, Hosp Community Psychiatry, 43, 599
- McGlashan, 1984, The chestnut lodge follow-up study II. Long-term outcome of schizophrenia and the affective disorders, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 41, 586, 10.1001/archpsyc.1984.01790170060007 · DOI
- Pfeiffer, 1990, An analysis of methodology in follow-up studies of adult inpatient psychiatric treatment, Hosp Community Psychiatry, 41, 1315
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rebar, A. L., Stanton, R., Geard, D., Short, C., Duncan, M. J., & Vandelanotte, C. (2015) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2015.1022901 · Cited by 1,323
Cannon, T. D., Cadenhead, K., Cornblatt, B., Woods, S. W., Addington, J., Walker, E., Seidman, L. J., Perkins, D., Tsuang, M., McGlashan, T., et al. (2008) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2007.3 · Cited by 1,269
Greenberg, B. D., Gabriels, L. A., Malone, D. A., Rezai, A. R., Friehs, G. M., Okun, M. S., Shapira, N. A., Foote, K. D., Cosyns, P. R., Kubu, C. S., et al. (2010) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2008.55 · Cited by 867
CNVs conferring risk of autism or schizophrenia affect cognition in controls
Stefansson, H., Meyer-Lindenberg, A., Steinberg, S., Magnusdottir, B., Morgen, K., Arnarsdottir, S., Bjornsdottir, G., Walters, G. B., Jonsdottir, G. A., Doyle, O. M., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12818 · Cited by 699
Ruhrmann, S., Schultze-Lutter, F., Salokangas, R. K. R., Heinimaa, M., Linszen, D., Dingemans, P., Birchwood, M., Patterson, P., Juckel, G., Heinz, A., et al. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.206 · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, R. C. W.
- Venue
- Psychosomatics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-275
- ISSN
- 0033-3182
- Cited by
- 975
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review