The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Binding of DNA on humic acids: Effect on transformation of Bacillus subtilis and resistance to DNase
Open accessAbstract
Equilibrium adsorption and binding of DNA from Bacillus subtilis on humic acids (HA) extracted from a forest soil, the capacity of the bound DNA to transform B. subtilis, and the resistance of the bound DNA to degradation by DNase I are reported. Adsorption of DNA on the HA was maximal after 2 and 4 h at pH 3.0 and 4.0, respectively. The adsorption of a constant amount of DNA (50 μg) on increasing concentrations of the HA reached a plateau with 2 and 3 mg of HA at pH 3.0 and 4.0, respectively. No plateau was observed when increasing amounts of DNA where adsorbed on a constant amount of the HA (2 mg). 70 to 80% of the adsorbed DNA was tightly bound after two washes with 0.1 M NaCl (pH 6.4), double distilled water (pH 5.5), or DNA buffer (pH 4.0). Bound DNA was capable of transforming auxotrophic and chloramphenicol-sensitive cells of B. subtilis, although at a lower frequency than free DNA. DNA bound on the HA was protected more against degradation by DNase I than free DNA: the concentration of DNase required to inhibit transformation by bound DNA was approximately 100 times higher than that required to inhibit transformation by comparable amounts of free DNA.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mao, D., Luo, Y., Mathieu, J., Wang, Q., Feng, L., Mu, Q., Feng, C., & Alvarez, P. J. J. (2014) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es404280v · Cited by 508
Neandertal and Denisovan DNA from Pleistocene sediments
Slon, V., Hopfe, C., Weiß, C. L., Mafessoni, F., de la Rasilla, M., Lalueza-Fox, C., Rosas, A., Soressi, M., Knul, M. V., Miller, R., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aam9695 · Cited by 465
Dodd, M. C. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Monitoring · doi:10.1039/c2em00006g · Cited by 462
Ancient and modern environmental DNA
Pedersen, M. W., Overballe-Petersen, S., Ermini, L., Sarkissian, C. D., Haile, J., Hellstrom, M., Spens, J., Thomsen, P. F., Bohmann, K., Cappellini, E., et al. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0383 · Cited by 329
Murchie, T. J., Kuch, M., Duggan, A. T., Ledger, M. L., Roche, K., Klunk, J., Karpinski, E., Hackenberger, D., Sadoway, T., MacPhee, R., et al. (2021) · Quaternary Research · doi:10.1017/qua.2020.59 · Cited by 105
Metadata
- Authors
- Crecchio, C., & Stotzky, G.
- Venue
- Soil Biology and Biochemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1998-08
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 8-9
- Pages
- 1061-1067
- ISSN
- 0038-0717 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071299484
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Binding of DNA on humic acids: Effect on transformation of Bacillus subtilis and resistance to DNase. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00248-4
- The paper
- Crecchio, C., & Stotzky, G. (1998). Binding of DNA on humic acids: Effect on transformation of Bacillus subtilis and resistance to DNase. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0038-0717(97)00248-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.