The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic objects in natural categories
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(76)90013-x · Cited by 5,643
Cited by
A mechanism for impaired fear recognition after amygdala damage
Adolphs, R., Gosselin, F., Buchanan, T. W., Tranel, D., Schyns, P., & Damasio, A. R. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03086 · Cited by 1,331
What does the amygdala contribute to social cognition
Adolphs, R. (2010) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2010.05445.x · Cited by 836
Vision in autism spectrum disorders
Simmons, D. R., Robertson, A. E., McKay, L. S., Toal, E., McAleer, P., & Pollick, F. E. (2009) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.08.005 · Cited by 827
Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions
Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001 · Cited by 706
Cultural Confusions Show that Facial Expressions Are Not Universal
Jack, R. E., Blais, C., Scheepers, C., Schyns, P. G., & Caldara, R. (2009) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.07.051 · Cited by 602
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G.
- Venue
- Vision Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2261-2271
- ISSN
- 0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056987789
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00097-9
- The paper
- Gosselin, F., & Schyns, P. G. (2001). Bubbles: a technique to reveal the use of information in recognition tasks. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00097-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
