Cited by 706Face Recognition and PerceptionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorFace recognition and analysis

Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions

Todorov, Alexander, Said, Chris P., Engell, Andrew D., Oosterhof, Nikolaas N.·2008·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

People reliably and automatically make personality inferences from facial appearance despite little evidence for their accuracy. Although such inferences are highly inter-correlated, research has traditionally focused on studying specific traits such as trustworthiness. We advocate an alternative, data-driven approach to identify and model the structure of face evaluation. Initial findings indicate that specific trait inferences can be represented within a 2D space defined by valence/trustworthiness and power/dominance evaluation of faces. Inferences along these dimensions are based on similarity to expressions signaling approach or avoidance behavior and features signaling physical strength, respectively, indicating that trait inferences from faces originate in functionally adaptive mechanisms. We conclude with a discussion of the potential role of the amygdala in face evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2008.10.001

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social theories suggest that the interaction between power and affiliation, rather than each factor separately, is the major determinant of social perception.

    “Social theories (Fiske, 2012; Todorov et al., 2008; Wiggins et al., 1989), however, suggest that the interaction between power and affiliation, rather than each factor separately, is the major determinant of social perception.”

    From A map for social navigation in the human brain (2015) · cites this paper as Todorov et al., 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Todorov, A., Said, C. P., Engell, A. D., & Oosterhof, N. N.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Todorov, Alexander
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-12
Volume
12
Issue
12
Pages
455-460
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000157509
Cited by
706
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 59 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 33
FWCI
1.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Kenyon (Kenyon College) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
Keywords
face evaluation, facial expression perception, personality inference, trustworthiness, valence, power, dominance, approach-avoidance behavior, physical strength, amygdala, social cognition
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Character, Computer Simulation, Emotions, Extraversion, Psychological, Facial Expression, Generalization, Stimulus, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Judgment, Perceptual Distortion, Social Dominance, Visual Perception, Personal Construct Theory, Trust

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review