Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 252

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes

Open access
Field, David J., Brady, Nuala·1997·Vision Research

Abstract

A number of researchers have suggested that in order to understand the response properties of cells in the visual pathway, we must consider the statistical structure of the natural environment. In this paper, we focus on one aspect of that structure, namely, the correlational structure which is described by the amplitude or power spectra of natural scenes. We propose that the principle insight one gains from considering the image spectra is in understanding the relative sensitivity of cells tuned to different spatial frequencies. This study employs a model in which the peak sensitivity is constant as a function of frequency with linear bandwith increasing (i.e., approximately constant in octaves). In such a model, the "response magnitude" (i.e., vector length) of cells increases as a function of their optimal (or central) spatial frequency out to about 20 cyc/deg. The result is a code in which the response to natural scenes, whose amplitude spectra typically fall as 1/f, is roughly constant out to 20 cyc/deg. An important consideration in evaluating this model of sensitivity is the fact that natural scenes show considerable variability in their amplitude spectra, with individual scenes showing falloffs which are often steeper or shallower than 1/f. Using a new measure of image structure (the "rectified contrast spectrum" or "RCS") on a set of calibrated natural images, it is shown that a large part of the variability in the spectra is due to differences in the sparseness of local structure at different scales. That is, an image which is "in focus" will have structure (e.g., edges) which has roughly the same magnitude across scale. That is, the loss of high frequency energy in some images is due to the reduction of the number of regions that contain structure rather than the amplitude of that structure. An "in focus" image will have structure (e.g., edges) across scale that have roughly equal magnitude but may vary in the area covered by structure. The slope of the RCS was found to provide a reasonable prediction of physical blur across a variety of scenes in spite of the variability in their amplitude spectra. It was also found to produce a good prediction of perceived blur as judged by human subjects.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00181-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 252

Metadata

Authors
Field, D. J., & Brady, N.
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-12
Volume
37
Issue
23
Pages
3367-3383
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1984075533
Cited by
252
References
2
FWCI
2.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00181-8
The paper
Field, D. J., & Brady, N. (1997). Visual sensitivity, blur and the sources of variability in the amplitude spectra of natural scenes. Vision Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00181-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.