Cited by 54Visual perception and processing mechanismsNeural dynamics and brain functionFace Recognition and Perception

Coding of the contrasts in natural images by populations of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1)

Open access
Clatworthy, P.L., Chirimuuta, M., Lauritzen, J.S., Tolhurst, D.J.·2003·Vision Research

Abstract

It is possible to discriminate between grating contrasts over a 300-fold contrast range, whereas V1 neurons have very limited dynamic ranges. Using populations of model neurons with contrast-response parameters taken from electrophysiological studies (cat and macaque), we investigated ways of combining responses to code contrast over the full range. One model implemented a pooling rule that retained information about individual response patterns. The second summed responses indiscriminately. We measured accuracy of contrast identification over a wide range of contrasts and found the first model to be more accurate; the mutual information between actual and estimated contrast was also greatest for this model. The accuracy peak for the population of cat neurons coincided with the peak of the distribution of contrasts in natural images, suggesting an ecological match. Macaque neurons seem better able to code contrasts that are slightly higher on average than those found in the natural environment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00277-3

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have found good agreement between population-level responses of gain-modulated neurons and psychophysical performance in visual contrast discrimination in humans and non-human primates.

    “Indeed, several studies have found good agreement between the population-level responses of gain-modulated neurons (such as the population-average contrast response function) and psychophysical performance (for example, in visual contrast discrimination) in humans and non-human primates12,20–24.”

    From Mechanisms underlying gain modulation in the cortex (2020) · cites this paper as [22]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Clatworthy, P. L., Chirimuuta, M., Lauritzen, J. S., & Tolhurst, D. J. (2001). Computer models of contrast coding by pools of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1). Journal of Physiology, 536P, 41-42.
  2. Lauritzen, J. S., & Tolhurst, D. J. (2000). A model of simple-cell contrast processing and normalisation in the mammalian visual cortex. Journal of Physiology, 526P, 158-159.
  3. Tolhurst, D. J. (1996). The limited contrast-response of single neurones in cat striate cortex and the distribution of contrast in natural scenes. Journal of Physiology, 497, 64.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clatworthy, P. L., Chirimuuta, M., Lauritzen, J. S., & Tolhurst, D. J.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Chirimuuta, M.
Venue
Vision Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
43
Issue
18
Pages
1983-2001
ISSN
0042-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964102929
Cited by
54
References
102
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Vision Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
Keywords
contrast coding, primary visual cortex, population coding, grating contrast, dynamic range, contrast response function, natural image statistics, mutual information, cats, macaque, ecological validity
MeSH terms
Animals, Haplorhini, Cats, Computer Simulation, Humans, Neurons, Visual Cortex, Contrast Sensitivity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review