CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 211

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Anaerobic treatment of real textile wastewater with a fluidized bed reactor

Şen, S, Demirer, G.N·2003·Water Research
DOI 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00577-8
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Anaerobic treatability of a real cotton textile wastewater was investigated in a fluidized bed reactor (FBR) with pumice as the support material. The immobilized biomass or attached volatile solids level on the support material was 0.073 g VSS/g support material at the end of the 128-d start-up period. During the operation period, real cotton textile wastewater was fed to the anaerobic FBR both unsupplemented (in Stages 1 and 2) and supplemented (with synthetic municipal wastewater in Stage 3 and glucose in Stages 4-6). The effect of operational conditions such as organic loading rate (OLR), hydraulic retention time (HRT), influent glucose concentration as the co-substrate, etc. was investigated to achieve the maximum color removal efficiency in the reactor. Results indicated that anaerobic treatment of textile wastewater studied was possible with the supplementation of an external carbon source in the form of glucose (about 2g/l). The corresponding maximum COD, BOD(5) and color removals were found to be around 82%, 94% and 59%, respectively, for HRT of around 24h and OLR of 3 kg COD/m(3)/d. Further increase in external carbon source added to real textile wastewater did not improve the color removal efficiency of the anaerobic FBR reactor.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00577-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Effluents from textile plants are categorized as the most polluting of all industrial sectors, considering volume produced and effluent composition.

    “The effluents from textile plants are categorized as the most adulterating of all the industrial sectors, considering the volume produced as well as the effluent composition (Sen and Demirer 2003;Dos Santos 2007;Ben Mansour et al., 2012).”

    From Textile Dyeing Effluents and Environment Concerns - A Review (2019) · cites this paper as Sen and Demirer 2003

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 40

  1. Fitzgerald, 1995, Two-stage anaerobic/aerobic treatment of sulfonated azo dyes, J Environ Sci Health A, 30, 1251
  2. Shore J. Dyeing with reactive dyes. In: Cellulosics Dyeing. Oxford, Manchester, UK: The Alden Press, 1995.
  3. Vandevivere, 1998, Treatment and reuse of wastewater from the textile wet-processing industry, J Chem Technol Biotech, 72, 289, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199808)72:4<289::AID-JCTB905>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  4. Razo-Flores, 1997, Biodegradation of selected azo dyes under methanogenic conditions, Water Sci Technol, 36, 65, 10.2166/wst.1997.0576 · DOI
  5. Banat, 1996, Microbial decolorization of textile-dye-containing effluents, Biores Technol, 58, 217, 10.1016/S0960-8524(96)00113-7 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brown, 1983, The degradation of dyestuffs, Chemosphere, 12, 397, 10.1016/0045-6535(83)90114-5 · DOI
  7. Carliell, 1995, Microbial decolorization of a reactive azo-dye under anaerobic conditions, Water SA, 21, 61
  8. Chinwekitvanich, 2000, Anaerobic decolorization of reactive dyebath effluents by a two-stage UASB system with tapioca as a co-substrate, Water Res, 34, 2223, 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00403-0 · DOI
  9. Razo-Flores, 1996, Biodegradability of N-substituted aromatics and alkylphenols under methanogenic conditions using granular sludge, Water Sci Technol, 33, 47, 10.2166/wst.1996.0058 · DOI
  10. Zaoyan, 1992, Anaerobic-aerobic treatment of a dye wastewater by combination of RBC with activated sludge, Water Sci Technol, 26, 2093, 10.2166/wst.1992.0669 · DOI
  11. Kool, 1984, Influence of microbial biomass on the biodegradability of organic compounds, Chemosphere, 13, 751, 10.1016/0045-6535(84)90178-4 · DOI
  12. Zeyer, 1985, Microbial mineralization of ring-substituted anilines through an orto-cleavage pathway, Appl Environ Microbiol, 50, 447, 10.1128/AEM.50.2.447-453.1985 · DOI
  13. O’Connor, 1993, Effect of nitrogen limitation on the biodegradability and toxicity of nitrophenol and aminophenol isomers to methanogenesis, Arch Environ Contam Toxicol, 25, 285
  14. Brown, 1987, The degradation of dye stuffs, Chemosphere, 16, 1539, 10.1016/0045-6535(87)90094-4 · DOI
  15. Seshadri, 1994, Anaerobic/aerobic treatment of selected azo dyes in wastewater, Waste Manage, 14, 127, 10.1016/0956-053X(94)90005-1 · DOI
  16. Denac, 1988, Packed-bed and fluidized bed biofilm reactor performance for anaerobic wastewater treatment, Biotech Bioeng, 32, 159, 10.1002/bit.260320206 · DOI
  17. Henze, 1983, Anaerobic treatment of wastewater in fixed film reactors - a literature review, Water Sci Technol, 15, 1, 10.2166/wst.1983.0161 · DOI
  18. Hickey, 1981, Methane generation from high strength industrial wastes with the anaerobic biological fluidized bed, Biotech, Bioeng Suppl, 11, 399
  19. Demirer, 1998, Toxicity of acrylic acid to acetate-enriched methanosarcina cultures, J Environ Eng Div ASCE, 124, 345, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(1998)124:4(345) · DOI
  20. Farhan, 1997, Performance of anaerobic reactors during pseudo-steady-state operation, J Chem Technol Biotech, 69, 45, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4660(199705)69:1<45::AID-JCTB638>3.0.CO;2-2 · DOI
  21. Garcia-Bernet, 1998, Application of the down-flow fluidized bed to the anaerobic treatment of wine distillery wastewater, Water Sci Technol, 38, 393, 10.2166/wst.1998.0830 · DOI
  22. Perez, 1999, Anaerobic thermophilic fluidized-bed treatment of industrial wastewater—effect of F-M relationship, Chemosphere, 38, 3443, 10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00556-6 · DOI
  23. Balaguer, 1991, Utilization of pumice stone as support for the anaerobic treatment of vinasse with a fluidized-bed reactor, Environ Technol, 12, 1167, 10.1080/09593339109385117 · DOI
  24. Stronach, 1987, Factors affecting biomass attachment during startup and operation of anaerobic fluidized-beds, Biotech Bioeng, 30, 611, 10.1002/bit.260300505 · DOI
  25. Manu, 2002, Anaerobic decolorisation of simulated textile wastewater containing azo dyes, Biores Technol, 82, 225, 10.1016/S0960-8524(01)00190-0 · DOI
  26. Robinson, 2001, Remediation of dyes in textile effluent, Biores Technol, 77, 247, 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00080-8 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Beydilli, 1998, Decolorization and toxicity screening of selected reactive azo dyes under methanogenic conditions, Water Sci Technol, 38, 225, 10.2166/wst.1998.0630 · DOI
  28. Huren A, Yi Q, Xiasheng G. A way for water pollution control in dye manufacturing industry. 49th Purdue Industrial Waste Conference Proceedings, Chelsea, MI, USA: Lewis Publishers, 1994.
  29. Bell, 2000, Treatment and decolorization of dyes in an anaerobic baffled reactor, J Environ Eng Div ASCE, 126, 1026, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:11(1026) · DOI
  30. Donlon, 1997, Detoxification and partial mineralization of the azo dye mordant orange 1 in a continuous upflow anaerobic sludge-blanket reactor, Appl Microbiol Biotech, 47, 83, 10.1007/s002530050893 · DOI
  31. Basibüyük, 1997, The use of sequential anaerobic/aerobic processes for the biotreatment of a simulated dyeing wastewater, Environ Technol, 18, 843, 10.1080/09593330.1997.9618562 · DOI
  32. O’Neill, 2000, Anaerobic-aerobic biotreatment of simulated textile effluent containing varied ratios of starch and azo dye, Water Res, 34, 2355, 10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00395-4 · DOI
  33. An, 1996, Biological treatment of dye wastewaters using an anaerobic-oxic system, Chemosphere, 33, 2533, 10.1016/S0045-6535(96)00349-9 · DOI
  34. Haug, 1991, Mineralization of the sulfonated azo dye mordant yellow-3 by a 6-aminonaphthalene-2-sulfonate-degrading bacterial consortium, Appl Environ Microbiol, 57, 3144, 10.1128/AEM.57.11.3144-3149.1991 · DOI
  35. Kuai, 1998, GAC-amended UASB reactor for the stable treatment of toxic textile wastewater, Environ Technol, 19, 1111, 10.1080/09593331908616769 · DOI
  36. Lourenço, 2000, Reactive textile dye color removal in a sequencing batch reactor, Water Sci Technol, 42, 321, 10.2166/wst.2000.0531 · DOI
  37. Nigam, 1996, Microbial process for the decolorization of textile effluent containing azo, diazo and reactive dyes, Process Biochem, 31, 435, 10.1016/0032-9592(95)00085-2 · DOI
  38. Oxspring, 1996, Decolourisation and metabolism of the reactive textile dye, remazol black B, by an immobilized microbial consortium, Biotech Lett, 18, 527, 10.1007/BF00140197 · DOI
  39. Panswad, 2000, Decolorization of reactive dyes with different molecular structures under different environmental conditions, Water Res, 34, 4177, 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00200-1 · DOI
  40. Meraz, 1995, Studies on the dynamics of immobilization of anaerobic bacteria on a plastic support, Water Sci Technol, 32, 243, 10.2166/wst.1995.0309 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Şen, S., & Demirer, G. N.
Venue
Water Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-04
Volume
37
Issue
8
Pages
1868-1878
ISSN
0043-1354
DOI
10.1016/s0043-1354(02)00577-8
Cited by
211
References
0
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review