Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 415

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lung pathology of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): a study of 8 autopsy cases from Singapore

Open access
Franks, Teri J, Chong, Pek Y, Chui, Paul, Galvin, Jeffrey R, Lourens, Raina M, Reid, Ann H, Selbs, Elena, Mcevoy, Col Peter L, Hayden, Col Dennis L, Fukuoka, Junya, Taubenberger, Jeffery K, Travis, William D·2003·Human Pathology

Abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) is an infectious condition caused by the SARS-associated coronavirus (SARS-CoV), a new member in the family Coronaviridae. To evaluate the lung pathology in this life-threatening respiratory illness, we studied postmortem lung sections from 8 patients who died from SARS during the spring 2003 Singapore outbreak. The predominant pattern of lung injury in all 8 cases was diffuse alveolar damage. The histology varied according to the duration of illness. Cases of 10 or fewer days’ duration demonstrated acute-phase diffuse alveolar damage (DAD), airspace edema, and bronchiolar fibrin. Cases of more than 10 days’ duration exhibited organizing-phase DAD, type II pneumocyte hyperplasia, squamous metaplasia, multinucleated giant cells, and acute bronchopneumonia. In acute-phase DAD, pancytokeratin staining was positive in hyaline membranes along alveolar walls and highlighted the absence of pneumocytes. Multinucleated cells were shown to be both type II pneumocytes and macrophages by pancytokeratin, thyroid transcription factor-1, and CD68 staining. SARS-CoV RNA was identified by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in 7 of 8 cases in fresh autopsy tissue and in 8 of 8 cases in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded lung tissue, including the 1 negative case in fresh tissue. Understanding the pathology of DAD in SARS patients may provide the basis for therapeutic strategies. Further studies of the pathogenesis of SARS may reveal new insight into the mechanisms of DAD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00367-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 415

Metadata

Authors
Franks, T. J., Chong, P. Y., Chui, P., Galvin, J. R., Lourens, R. M., Reid, A. H., Selbs, E., Mcevoy, C. P. L., Hayden, C. D. L., Fukuoka, J., Taubenberger, J. K., & Travis, W. D.
Venue
Human Pathology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-08
Volume
34
Issue
8
Pages
743-748
ISSN
0046-8177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1967986697
Cited by
415
References
2
FWCI
16.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lung pathology of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): a study of 8 autopsy cases from Singapore. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00367-8
The paper
Franks, T. J., Chong, P. Y., Chui, P., Galvin, J. R., Lourens, R. M., Reid, A. H., Selbs, E., Mcevoy, C. P. L., Hayden, C. D. L., Fukuoka, J., Taubenberger, J. K., & Travis, W. D. (2003). Lung pathology of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): a study of 8 autopsy cases from Singapore. Human Pathology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00367-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.