Cited by 174Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalusBarrier Structure and Function StudiesAdvanced MRI Techniques and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Discussion

G M Shearer·1997·Mechanisms of Ageing and Development

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0047-6374(96)01849-0

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–174 of 174

Metadata

Authors
Shearer, G. M.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
G M Shearer
Venue
Mechanisms of Ageing and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-03
Volume
94
Issue
1-3
Pages
1-5
ISSN
0047-6374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W143197739
Cited by
174
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mechanisms of Ageing and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
Keywords
blood-CSF barrier, choroid plexus epithelium, contrast-enhanced MRI, gadolinium enhancement, blood-CSF barrier permeability, age-related neurodegeneration, manganese contrast agent, cerebrospinal fluid homeostasis
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Humans, Cytokines, Th1 Cells, Th2 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review