Science–industry interaction in the process of innovation: the importance of boundary-crossing between systems
Open accessThe claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on 'innovation systems' has recently illustrated that innovation occurs more effectively where there is exchange of knowledge between systems, for example: between different industries; regions; or between science and industry.
“Research on 'innovation systems' has recently illustrated that innovation occurs more effectively where there is exchange of knowledge between systems, for example: between different industries; regions; or between science and industry (Kaufmann and Tödtling, 2001).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Kaufmann and Tödtling, 2001
The Introduction and Section 4 say that exchange between different social systems can strengthen firms’ innovativeness, particularly through science–industry interaction. Section 2 discusses regional innovation systems, but the cited passages do not establish that knowledge exchange between regions—or between different industries—makes innovation more effective. The paper also cautions in Section 4 that science–industry interaction alone is no guarantee of increased innovativeness. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIntegration of suppliers in the innovation process is one factor leading to frame-breaking innovation.
“The integration of suppliers in the innovation process has been highlighted as one of the factors leading to frame-breaking innovation (Kaufmann and Tödtling's, 2001;Perez and Sanchez's, 2002;Romijn and Albu's, 2002).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Kaufmann and Tödtling's, 2001
The value of diverse partners for innovation is demonstrated in Kaufmann and Tödtling's (2001) empirical research and were supported by Perez and Sanchez's (2002) work on technology networks in the Spanish automobile industry and Romijn and Albu's (2002) work on small high technology firms in the UK.
“The value of diverse partners for innovation is demonstrated in Kaufmann and Tödtling's (2001) empirical research and were supported by Perez and Sanchez's (2002) work on technology networks in the Spanish automobile industry and Romijn and Albu's (2002) work on small high technology firms in the UK.”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Kaufmann and Tödtling's (2001)
The importance of diversity of relationships in networks has been shown to have an impact on innovativeness.
“Based on this work the importance of diversity of relationships in networks has been shown to have an impact on innovativeness (Kaufmann and Tödtling, 2001).”
From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Kaufmann and Tödtling, 2001
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Braczyk, H., Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M. (Eds.), 1998. Regional innovation systems. UCL Press, London.
- Dosi, G., 1988. The nature of the innovation process. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory. Pinter, London, pp. 221-238.
- Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), 1988. Technical change and economic theory. Pinter, London.
- Edquist, C. (Ed.), 1997. Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. Pinter, London.
- Freeman, C., 1992. Formal scientific and technical institutions in the national system of innovation. In: Lundvall, B. (Ed.), National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London, pp. 169-187.
- Fritsch, M., Lukas, R., 1997. Innovation, cooperation, and the region. Paper presented at the conference "The impact of technological change on firm and industry performance" Tinbergen Institute, Rotterdam, 29/30.8.1997.
- Grabher, G. (Ed.), 1993. The embedded firm: on the socioeconomics of industrial networks. Routledge, London.
- Granovetter, M., 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78/6, 1360-1380.
- von Hippel, E., 1988. The sources of innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Johnson, B., 1992. Institutional learning. In: Lundvall, B. (Ed.), National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London, pp. 23-44.
- Kline, S. J., Rosenberg, N., 1986. An overview of innovation. In: Landau, R., Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth. National Academy Press, Washington, pp. 275-307.
- Koschatzky, K., 1998. Firm innovation and region: the role of space in innovation processes. International Journal of Innovation Management 2/4, 383-408.
- Landau, R., Rosenberg, N. (Eds.), 1986. The positive sum strategy: harnessing technology for economic growth. National Academy Press, Washington.
- Lundvall, B. (Ed.), 1992. National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London.
- Lundvall, B., 1992. User-producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalisation. In: Lundvall, B. (Ed.), National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter, London, pp. 45-67.
- Maier, G., Weiss, P., 1990. Modelle diskreter Entscheidungen. Springer, Wien.
- Malecki, E. J., 1997. Technology and economic development. Addison Wesley Longman, Harlow.
- Edquist, C. (Ed.), Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. Pinter, London, pp. 200-222.
- Meyer-Krahmer, F., 1997. Science-based technologies and interdisciplinarity: challenges for firms and policy. In: Edquist, C. (Ed.), Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. Pinter, London, pp. 298-317.
- Nelson, R. R. (Ed.), 1993. National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
- Nelson, R. R. (Ed.), National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3-21.
- Reinhold, G., Lamnek, S., Recker, H. (Eds.), 1992. Soziologie-Lexikon. Oldenbourg, München.
- Saviotti, P. P., 1997. Innovation systems and evolutionary theories. In: Edquist, C. (Ed.), Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions and organizations. Pinter, London, pp. 180-199.
- Saxenian, A., 1996. Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge/Mass.
- Schumpeter, J. A., 1934. The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge/Mass.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence
Pittaway, L., Robertson, M., Munir, K., Denyer, D., & Neely, A. (2004) · International Journal of Management Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1460-8545.2004.00101.x · Cited by 1,747 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kaufmann, A., & Tödtling, F.
- Affiliations
- Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Kaufmann, Alexander
- Venue
- Research Policy
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2001-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 791-804
- ISSN
- 0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1543459541
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 45 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 24.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Research Policy (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Econstor (Econstor) (submittedVersion)
- WU Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › University-Industry-Government Innovation Models
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
- Keywords
- science-industry interaction, innovation networks, boundary crossing, social systems theory, innovation systems, science partnerships, new product launch, customer relationships, European regions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
