Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,025

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England

Romijn, Henny, Albaladejo, Manuel·2002·Research Policy
DOI 10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00176-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00176-7

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 55

  1. Archibugi, 1996, Measuring technological change through patents and innovation surveys, Technovation, 16, 451, 10.1016/0166-4972(96)00031-4 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Asheim, 1996, Industrial districts as learning regions: a condition for prosperity, European Planning Studies, 4, 379, 10.1080/09654319608720354 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Audretsch, 1998, Agglomeration and the location of innovative activity, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12, 18, 10.1093/oxrep/14.2.18 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Basberg, 1987, Patents and the measurement of technological change: a survey of the literature, Research Policy, 16, 131, 10.1016/0048-7333(87)90027-8 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Beavis, S., 1998. When proximity powers profits. Financial Times, 18 November, p. 19. · doi:10.1023/a:1022666415355
  6. Becattini, G., 1989. Sectors and/or districts: some remarks on the conceptual foundations of industrial economics. In: Goodman, E., Bamford, J., Saynor, P. (Eds.), Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy. Routledge, London.
  7. Bell, M., 1984. Learning and the accumulation of industrial technological capability in developing countries. In: Fransman, M., King, K. (Eds.), Technological Capability in the Third World. Macmillan, London, pp. 187–209. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bessant, 1999, The rise and fall of Supernet: a case study of technology transfer policy for smaller firms, Research Policy, 28, 601, 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00002-5 · DOI
  9. Best, M.H., 1990. The New Competition. Institutions of Industrial Restructuring. Polity Press, Cambridge.
  10. Camagni, R. (Ed.), 1991. Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. Belhaven Press, London.
  11. Caniëls, M.C.J., 2000. Knowledge Spillovers and Economic Growth. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham. · doi:10.4337/9781782543190
  12. Centre for Business Research, 1996. The Changing State of British Enterprise. ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  13. Cooke, 1997, Regional innovation systems: institutional and organisations dimensions, Research Policy, 26, 475, 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00025-5 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Cosh, A., Hughes, A., Wood, E., 1996. Innovation in UK SMEs: causes and the consequences for firm failure and acquisition. Working Paper 48, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge. · doi:10.1007/bf00924974
  15. Curran, J., Blackburn, R.A. (Eds.), 1994. Small Firms and Local Economic Networks: The Death of the Local Economy. Routledge, London.
  16. Dicken, P., Forsgren, M., Malmberg, A., 1994. The local embeddedness of transnational corporations. In: Amin, A., Thrift, N. (Eds.), Globalization, Institutions and Regional Development in Europe. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 23–45. · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198289166.003.0002
  17. Dodgson, 1991, Technology learning, technology strategy and competitive pressures, British Journal of Management, 2/3, 132
  18. Dodgson, 1993, Organisational learning: a review of some literatures, Organisation Studies, 14, 375, 10.1177/017084069301400303 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Freeman, 1991, Networks of innovators: a synthesis of research issues, Research Policy, 20, 499, 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-X · DOI · Paper page
  20. Freeman, 1995, The national system of innovation in historical perspective, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 5
  21. Garvin, D.A., 1993. Building a learning organization. Harvard Business Review, July–August, pp. 78–91.
  22. Griliches, 1990, Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey, Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1661
  23. Håkansson, H., 1989. Corporate Technological Behaviour: Co-operation and Networks. Routledge, London.
  24. Hitt, 2000, Technological learning, knowledge management, firm growth and performance: an introductory essay, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17, 231, 10.1016/S0923-4748(00)00024-2 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hoffman, 1998, Small firms, R&D, technology and innovation in the UK: a literature review, Technovation, 18, 39, 10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00102-8 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Huggins, 1998, Local business co-operation and training and enterprise councils: the development of inter-firm networks, Regional Studies, 32, 813, 10.1080/00343409850117979 · DOI
  27. Keeble, 1998, Internationalisation processes, networking and local embeddedness in technology-intensive small firms, Small Business Economics, 11, 327, 10.1023/A:1007942612220 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Keeble, 1999, Collective learning processes, networking and institutional thickness in the Cambridge region, Regional Studies, 33, 319, 10.1080/713693557 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Kim, L., Nelson, R. (Eds.), 2000. Technology, Learning and Innovation: Experiences of Newly Industrializing Economies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  30. Lundvall, B.-Å., 1988. Innovation as an interactive process: from user–producer interaction to the national system of innovation. In: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London, pp. 349–369.
  31. Lundvall, B.-Å., 1992. User–producer relationships, national systems of innovation and internationalisation. In: Lundvall, B.-Å. (Ed.), National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Pinter, London, pp. 45–67.
  32. Malerba, 1992, Learning by firms and incremental technical change, The Economic Journal, 102, 845, 10.2307/2234581 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Massey, D., Quintas, P., Wield, D., 1992. High Tech Fantasies: Science Parks in Society, Science and Space. Routledge, London.
  34. Oakey, 1999, United Kingdom high-technology small firms in theory and practice: a review of recent trends, International Small Business Journal, 17, 48, 10.1177/0266242699172003 · DOI
  35. Panda, 1996, Technological capability assessment of a firm in the electricity sector, Technovation, 16, 561, 10.1016/S0166-4972(97)82896-9 · DOI
  36. Patel, P., Pavitt, K., 1995. Patterns of technological activity: their measurement and interpretation. In: Stoneman, P. (Ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change. Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 14–51.
  37. Pavitt, 1985, Patent statistics as indicators of innovation activities, Scientometrics, 7, 77, 10.1007/BF02020142 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Pavitt, 1987, The size distribution of innovating firms in the UK 1945–1983, Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 279, 10.2307/2098636 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Porter, M.E., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. The Free Press, New York. · DOI · Paper page
  40. Saxenian, A., 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
  41. SBRC, 1992. The State of British Enterprise: Growth, Innovation and Competitive Advantage in Small and Medium Sized Firm. Small Business Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge.
  42. Schmitz, 1995, Collective efficiency: growth path for small-scale industry, Journal of Development Studies, 31, 529, 10.1080/00220389508422377 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Scott, A., Storper, M., 1992. Regional development reconsidered. In: Ernste, H., Meier, V. (Eds.), Regional Development and Contemporary Industrial Response: Extending Flexible Specialization. Belhaven Press, London, pp. 3–26.
  44. Simmie, J., 1997. The origins and characteristics of innovation in highly innovative areas: the case of Hertfordshire. In: Simmie, J. (Ed.), Innovation, Networks and Learning Regions? Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London.
  45. Steiner, M. (Ed.), 1998. Clusters and Regional Specialisation. Pion, London.
  46. Sternberg, 1999, Innovative linkages and proximity: empirical results from recent surveys of small and medium sized firms in German regions, Regional Studies, 33, 529, 10.1080/00343409950078224 · DOI
  47. Storey, D.J., 1994. Understanding the Small Business Sector. International Thomson Business Press, London.
  48. Storper, 1993, Regional Worlds of production: learning and innovation in the technology districts of France, Italy and the USA, Regional Studies, 27, 433, 10.1080/00343409312331347675 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Storper, 1991, Flexibility, hierarchy and regional development: the changing structure of industrial production systems and their forms of governance in the 1990s, Research Policy, 20, 407, 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90066-Y · DOI · Paper page
  50. Suarez-Villa, 1997, Operational strategy, R&D and intra-metropolitan clustering in a polycentric structure: the advanced electronics industries of the Los Angeles basin, Urban Studies, 34, 1343, 10.1080/0042098975466 · DOI
  51. UNCTAD, 1996. Fostering technological dynamism: evolution of thought on technological development processes and competitiveness. A Review of the Literature. United Nations, Geneva.
  52. Vedovello, 1997, Science parks and university–industry interaction: geographical proximity between the agents as a driving force, Technovation, 17, 491, 10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00027-8 · DOI · Paper page
  53. Von Hippel, E., 1988. The Sources of Innovation. Oxford University Press, New York.
  54. Westhead, 1995, Employment change in independent owner-managed high-technology firms in Great Britain, Small Business Economics, 7, 111, 10.1007/BF01108686 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Wignaraja, G., 1998. Trade Policy, Technology and Exports: Sri Lanka’s Liberalisation Experience. Macmillan, London. · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-26267-0

Cited by

See all 1,025

Metadata

Authors
Romijn, H., & Albaladejo, M.
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-09
Volume
31
Issue
7
Pages
1053-1067
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00176-7
OpenAlex
W2004195467
Cited by
1,025
References
3
FWCI
29.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00176-7
The paper
Romijn, H., & Albaladejo, M. (2002). Determinants of innovation capability in small electronics and software firms in southeast England. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0048-7333(01)00176-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.