Cited by 397Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategy and InnovationFirm Innovation and Growth

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

External linkages and innovation in small and medium‐sized enterprises

Rothwell, Roy, Dodgson, Mark·1991·R&D Management

Abstract

While small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) can enjoy a number of behavioural advantages over their larger counterparts in the innovation process (e.g. rapid response to external threats and opportunities; efficient internal communication; interactive management style), they can also suffer from a number of mainly material disadvantages (e.g. inability to spread risk over a portfolio of new products; difficulties in market start‐up abroad; problems in funding longer‐term R&D). One area in which SMEs can suffer a marked disadvantage is that of establishing the appropriate network of contacts with external sources of scientific and technological expertise and advice. This paper addresses the issue of SMEs’ external linkages and presents data from a number of studies showing the importance of in‐house technical skills to linkage activity; the importance of complementary between in‐house and external know‐how accumulation; and the importance of technology strategy in guiding the accumulation process. SME‐oriented public technology policies should be adapted to the specific needs of SMEs in that they should focus on facilitating vertical (supplier‐manufacturercustomer) linkages and offer support throughout the innovation chain from pre‐ competitive research through to product development. Numerous studies testify to the importance of firms extensively ‘networking’ in order to improve innovation potential (for example, Mowery, 1988; Contractor and Lorange, 1988; CEST, 1990). The majority of these studies focus on formal technology agreements, such as R&D joint ventures,; tend to feature large firm collaboration rather than that undertaken by small and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs); and while they often refer to the management problems involved in collaboration, few examine their management in any depth. This paper will describe the extensive collaborations of innovative SMEs, and will emphasise how the employment of key personnel affects the range and scope of linkages. It will highlight the broad diversity of linkages used by SMEs for technological development. And, by means of a case study of a highly technologically advanced SME, it will examine some of the most important management problems facing the collaborative process.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1991.tb00742.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Networks enable small business owners to link into R&D that is contracted out by larger firms, to engage in joint R&D ventures and to set-up marketing and manufacturing relationships.

    “Networks enable small business owners to link into R&D that is contracted out by larger firms, to engage in joint R&D ventures and to set-up marketing and manufacturing relationships (Rothwell and Dodgson, 1991).”

    From Networking and innovation: a systematic review of the evidence (2004) · cites this paper as Rothwell and Dodgson, 1991

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. Angell C., 1984, Information Transfer in Engineering and Science
  2. Barber J., 1989, Barriers to Growth in Small Firms
  3. Beesley M., 1987, Innovation, Adaptation and Growth
  4. Contractor F., 1988, Cooperative Strategies in International Business
  5. Dekker D., 1989, European Commission and TH
  6. Dodgson M., 1989, Technology Strategy and the Firm: Management and Public Policy
  7. Dodgson M.(1989b) ‘Strategies for Technological Learning: New Forms of Organisational Structure’ Paper presented at the APROS Conference on Organisations Technologies and Culture Australian National University Canberra December.
  8. Dodgson M., 1990, The Economics of Small Firms
  9. Dodgson M., 1991, The Management of Technological Learning, 10.1515/9783110867749 · DOI
  10. Dodgson M., 1989, Technology Strategy and the Firm: Management and Public Policy
  11. Dodgson M.andRothwell R.(1990) ‘Strategies for Technological Accumulation in Innovative Small and Medium‐Sized Firms’ paper presented at the Symposium on Growth and Development of Small High‐Tech Businesses Cranfield Institute of Technology April.
  12. Maier H.(1988) ‘Partnerships Between Small and Large Firms: Current Trends and Prospects’ paper presented at the Conference on Partnerships Between Small and Large Firms Brussels June.
  13. Mowery D., 1988, International Collaborative Ventures in US Manufacturing
  14. NEDO, 1987, Corporate Venturing
  15. Parolini C.(1990) ‘Growth Paths for Small and Medium High‐Tech Companies’ paper presented at the Symposium on Growth and Development of Small High‐Tech Businesses Cranfield Institute of Technology April.
  16. 10.1002/hrm.3930270105 · DOI
  17. Roberts E.andBerry C.(1985) ‘Entering New Business: Strategies for Success’ Sloan Management Review Spring.
  18. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1976.tb01099.x · DOI
  19. Rothwell R., 1983, The Role of Small Firms in the Emergence of New Technology, Omega, 12, 10.1016/0305-0483(84)90007-0 · DOI
  20. Rothwell R., 1983, Innovation and Firm Size: A Case of Dynamic Complementarity, Journal of General Management, 8, 10.1177/030630708300800301 · DOI
  21. 10.1080/0267257X.1986.9964004 · DOI
  22. Rothwell R., 1989, Small Firms, Innovation and Industrial Change, Small Business Economics, 10.1007/BF00389916 · DOI
  23. 10.1080/08985628900000024 · DOI
  24. Rothwell R., 1989, Barriers to Growth in Small Firms
  25. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.1988.tb00579.x · DOI
  26. Tiler C.andGibbons M.(1990) ‘The Teaching Company Scheme as a Mechanism for Enhancing the Knowledge Base of Firms’ paper presented at the workshop ‘Processes of Knowledge Accumulation and the Formulation of Technology Strategy’ Kalundborg Denmark May.
  27. Hippel E., 1976, The Dominant Role of the User in the Scientific Instrument Innovation Process, Research Policy, 5

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Rothwell, R., & Dodgson, M.
Affiliations
University of Sussex (GB)
Venue
R&D Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1991-04
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
125-138
ISSN
  • 0033-6807 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9310
OpenAlex
W2155298162
Cited by
397
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 17
FWCI
25.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
R and D Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategy and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Firm Innovation and Growth
Keywords
small and medium-sized enterprises, external linkages, innovation, technology strategy, knowledge accumulation, vertical linkages, R&D cooperation, business networking, key personnel

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review