Cited by 108Plant tissue culture and regenerationPlant Genetic and Mutation StudiesGenetics and Plant Breeding

Tissue culture-induced variation and crop improvement

Duncan, R.R.·1996·Advances in Agronomy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0065-2113(08)60256-4

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Highly differentiated tissues such as roots, leaves, and stems generally produce more somaclonal variations than explants with pre-existing meristems, such as axillary buds and shoot tips.

    “Highly differentiated tissues such as roots, leaves, and stems generally produce more somaclonal variations than explants with pre-existing meristems, such as axillary buds and shoot tips [17].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Duncan, R. R.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Corresponding author
Duncan, R.R.
Venue
Advances in Agronomy
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1996
Pages
201-240
ISSN
0065-2113 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1780794000
Cited by
108
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.06
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Advances in agronomy (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Plant tissue culture and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
Keywords
plant regeneration, in vitro selection, crop improvement, mutation breeding, trait stability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review