The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nitrate and Ammonium Nutrition of Plants: Physiological and Molecular Perspectives
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pao, S. S., Paulsen, I. T., & Saier, M. H. (1998) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.62.1.1-34.1998 · Cited by 2,297
Cited by
STITT, M., & KRAPP, A. (1999) · Plant, Cell & Environment · doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00386.x · Cited by 1,044
Functional biology of plant phosphate uptake at root and mycorrhiza interfaces
Bucher, M. (2007) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01935.x · Cited by 718
Nitrate regulation of metabolism and growth
Stitt, M. (1999) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(99)80033-8 · Cited by 587
The nutritional control of root development
Forde, B., & Lorenzo, H. (2001) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1010329902165 · Cited by 474
Self-citationAn Arabidopsis T‐DNA mutant affected in Nrt2 genes is impaired in nitrate uptake
Filleur, S., Dorbe, M.-F., Cerezo, M., Orsel, M., Granier, F., Gojon, A., & Daniel-Vedele, F. (2001) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02096-8 · Cited by 323
Metadata
- Authors
- Forde, B. G., & Clarkson, D. T.
- Venue
- Advances in Botanical Research
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1999
- Pages
- 1-90
- ISSN
- 0065-2296 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1788326859
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 39.47
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nitrate and Ammonium Nutrition of Plants: Physiological and Molecular Perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0065-2296(08)60226-8
- The paper
- Forde, B. G., & Clarkson, D. T. (1999). Nitrate and Ammonium Nutrition of Plants: Physiological and Molecular Perspectives. Advances in Botanical Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2296(08)60226-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.