The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Economics of Fleeing from Predators
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
On Optimal Use of a Patchy Environment
MacArthur, R. H., & Pianka, E. R. (1966) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/282454 · Cited by 4,593
Hawks and Doves: Factors Affecting Success and Selection in Goshawk Attacks on Woodpigeons
Kenward, R. E. (1978) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/3793 · Cited by 539
Cited by
Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus
Lima, S. L., & Dill, L. M. (1990) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/z90-092 · Cited by 8,196
Self-citationFunctions of Shoaling Behaviour in Teleosts
Pitcher, T. J. (1986) · The Behaviour of Teleost Fishes · doi:10.1007/978-1-4684-8261-4_12 · Cited by 962
A synaptic threshold mechanism for computing escape decisions
Evans, D. A., Stempel, A. V., Vale, R., Ruehle, S., Lefler, Y., & Branco, T. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0244-6 · Cited by 449
Childress, M. J., & Lung, M. A. (2003) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1006/anbe.2003.2217 · Cited by 304
Collective detection of predatory attack by social foragers: fraught with ambiguity?
Lima, S. L. (1995) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/0003-3472(95)80109-x · Cited by 179
Metadata
- Authors
- Ydenberg, R. C., & Dill, L. M.
- Venue
- Advances in the Study of Behavior
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1986
- Pages
- 229-249
- ISSN
- 0065-3454 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1585086945
- Cited by
- 1,342
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 39.29
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.