The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogenies of Glutathione Transferase Families
Abstract
The best known glutathione transferase family, with its class-alpha, -mu, -pi, -omega, -sigma, -theta, and -zeta subdivisions, is only one of four, or perhaps five, ancient protein families that conjugate glutathione or use a glutathione intermediate: (1) the cytoplasmic family, (2) the mitochondrial (kappa) family, (3) the microsomal (MAPEG) family, which may actually be two separate families, and (4) the fosphomycin/glyoxalase family. Although the cytoplasmic family is perhaps the most diverse, all four of these families have homologs in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes; it is striking that at least three, and perhaps as many as five, different protein folds capable of binding and positioning glutathione for a nucleophilic attack emerged more than 2 billion years ago. This chapter presents phylogenies for the four (or five) glutathione transferase families, focusing on the statistical evidence for homology (and non-homology).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The six urchin theta-class GST genes are most closely related to vertebrate theta-class GSTs, rather than to the insect thetaclass GSTs, aiding the phylogenetic resolution of this widespread GST-family (Nebert and Vasiliou, 2004;Pearson, 2005).”
From The chemical defensome: Environmental sensing and response genes in the Strongylocentrotus purpuratus genome (2006) · cites this paper as Pearson, 2005
Citations
Cites
Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs
Altschul, S. (1997) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · Cited by 73,302
Thompson, J. D., Higgins, D. G., & Gibson, T. J. (1994) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/22.22.4673 · Cited by 64,617
PHYLIP-Phylogeny inference package (Version 3.2)
Felsenstein, J. (1989) · Cladistics · Cited by 17,682
Hayes, J. D., Flanagan, J. U., & Jowsey, I. R. (2004) · The Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.45.120403.095857 · Cited by 3,565
Ramos-Gomez, M., Kwak, M.-K., Dolan, P. M., Itoh, K., Yamamoto, M., Talalay, P., & Kensler, T. W. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.051618798 · Cited by 1,102
Mannervik, B., Ålin, P., Guthenberg, C., Jensson, H., Tahir, M. K., Warholm, M., & Jörnvall, H. (1985) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.82.21.7202 · Cited by 1,072
SCOP database in 2004: refinements integrate structure and sequence family data
Andreeva, A. E. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh039 · Cited by 909
Theta, a new class of glutathione transferases purified from rat and man
Meyer, D. J., Coles, B., Pemble, S. E., Gilmore, K. S., FRASER, G. M., & KETTERER, B. (1991) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2740409 · Cited by 737
The SWISS-PROT protein sequence data bank and its new supplement TREMBL
Bairoch, A. (1996) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/24.1.21 · Cited by 498
Jakobsson, P., Morgenstern, R., Mancini, J. A., Ford‐Hutchinson, A. W., & Persson, B. (1999) · Protein Science · doi:10.1110/ps.8.3.689 · Cited by 366
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Glutathione catalysis and the reaction mechanisms of glutathione-dependent enzymes
Deponte, M. (2012) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - General Subjects · doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2012.09.018 · Cited by 1,150
Biotransformation of Xenobiotics
Timbrell, J. A., & Marrs, T. C. (2009) · General, Applied and Systems Toxicology · doi:10.1002/9780470744307.gat004 · Cited by 435
Jain, M., Ghanashyam, C., & Bhattacharjee, A. (2010) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/1471-2164-11-73 · Cited by 313
Goldstone, J. V., Hamdoun, A., Cole, B. J., Howard-Ashby, M., Nebert, D. W., Scally, M., Dean, M., Epel, D., Hahn, M. E., & Stegeman, J. J. (2006) · Developmental Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.08.066 · Cited by 280
Sharma, R. K., Sahoo, A., Devendran, R., & Jain, M. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092900 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Pearson, W. R.
- Affiliations
- University of Virginia (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pearson, William R.
- ORCID
- Pearson, William R.
- Venue
- Methods in Enzymology
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 2005
- Volume
- 401
- Pages
- 186-204
- ISSN
- 0076-6879 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1538865925
- Cited by
- 105
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 10.12
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms
- Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Redox biology and oxidative stress
- Keywords
- glutathione S-transferase, protein family phylogeny, glutathione conjugation, protein fold evolution, homology detection
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cytoplasm, Multigene Family, Glutathione Transferase, Humans, Isoenzymes, Microsomes, Phylogeny, Thioredoxins, Evolution, Molecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
