Cited by 140Visual perception and processing mechanismsMotor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chapter 9 Look and see: how the brain moves your eyes about

Schiller, Peter H., Tehovnik, Edward J.·2001·Progress in Brain Research

Abstract

Two major cortical streams are involved in the generation of visually guided saccadic eye movements: the anterior and the posterior. The anterior stream from the frontal and medial eye fields has direct access to brainstem oculomotor centers. The posterior stream from the occipital cortices reaches brainstem oculomotor centers through the superior colliculus. The parietal cortex interconnects with both streams. Our findings suggest that the posterior stream plays an unique role in the execution of rapid, short-latency eye movements called 'express saccades'. Both the anterior and posterior streams play a role in the selection of targets to which saccades are to be generated, but do so in different ways. Areas V1, V2 and LIP contribute to decisions involved in where to look as well as where not to look. In addition, area LIP is involved in decisions about how long to maintain fixation prior to the execution of a saccade. Area V4 does not appear to be directly involved in eye-movement generation. In the anterior stream, the frontal eye fields, and to a lesser extent the medial eye fields, are involved in the correct execution of saccades subsequent to decisions made about where to look and where not to look.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-6123(01)34010-4

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous applications of microstimulation to area LIP have led to the idea that this area plays a role in the timing of saccades but not to eye movement selection.

    “Previous applications of microstimulation to area LIP have led to the idea that this area plays a role in the timing of saccades but not to eye movement selection31.”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bisiach, 1988, Hemineglect in humans, Vol. 1, 195
  2. Schiller, 2000, The role of cortical areas in target selection with saccadic eye movements, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 26, 1075

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Schiller, P. H., & Tehovnik, E. J.
Affiliations
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Schiller, Peter H.
Venue
Progress in Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2001
Volume
134
Pages
127-142
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1605238504
Cited by
140
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
20.67
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
saccades, visual attention, oculomotor control, superior colliculus, frontal eye field, parietal cortex, area V1, V2, area V4, lateral intraparietal area, target selection, fixation duration, express saccades
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Electric Stimulation, Eye Movements, Photic Stimulation, Saccades

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review