Cited by 84Neurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCerebrovascular and genetic disorders

Central Nervous System Findings in a Tenth Decade Autopsy Population

Peress, N.S., Kane, W.C., Aronson, S.M.·1973·Progress in Brain Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0079-6123(08)60707-4

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peress, N. S., Kane, W. C., & Aronson, S. M.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Venue
Progress in Brain Research
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1973
Volume
40
Issue
0
Pages
473-483
ISSN
0079-6123 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W134768974
Cited by
84
References
11
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.94
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Progress in brain research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Cerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Keywords
central nervous system pathology, cerebrovascular disease, brain weight, aging, diabetes mellitus, encephalomalacia, cerebral infarction, intracerebral hemorrhage, apoplexy, race and sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aging, Autopsy, Brain, Brain Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review