The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A new standard of care
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: Adrenalectomy is the mainstay of treatment for adrenal tumors. A variety of surgical approaches to the adrenal gland have been described. We studied the feasibility of laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), compared laparoscopic with open adrenalectomy (OA), and studied the hemodynamic changes in patients with pheochromocytoma. METHODS: Our early experience with 20 consecutive LAs is compared with a contemporaneous, matched control cohort of 20 patients who underwent OA via a flank or subcostal incision. LA was performed via a transperitoneal approach, following a standardized surgical technique. RESULTS: LA was successfully completed in 18 of 20 cases. Average operating time in the first 5 cases was 261 minutes, but, with further experience, a significant decrease in operative time was seen in the last cohort of 4 patients (155 minutes) (P = 0.0018). There was no significant difference in operative time or degree of blood loss between LA and OA groups. Patients who underwent LA required lower doses of postoperative parenteral narcotics (P = 0.0169), had a shorter hospital stay (mean 3.2 days) (P < 0.0001), and had a shorter convalescent period (mean 3.1 weeks) (P < 0.0001). Complications in the laparoscopic group (chronic port site pain in 1 patient, intra-abdominal fluid collection in another) occurred in the 2 patients who required open conversion. These 2 patients had large adrenal tumors (9 and 7 cm in diameter, respectively). LA resulted in similar hemodynamic changes as OA in patients with pheochromocytoma. CONCLUSIONS: LA is a safe and effective approach in most patients with adrenal pathology. Benefits include excellent operative exposure and visualization, less postoperative pain, shorter hospital stay and convalescent period, and improved cosmetic result. Pheochromocytoma is not a contraindication to LA. Patients with large adrenal tumors (larger than 6 cm), evidence of venous involvement, or invasion into surrounding tissue should be approached cautiously.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lenders, J. W., Eisenhofer, G., Mannelli, M., & Pacak, K. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)67139-5 · Cited by 1,524
The clinically inapparent adrenal mass: update in diagnosis and management
Mansmann, G., Lau, J., Balk, E., Rothberg, M., Miyachi, Y., & Bornstein, S. R. (2004) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0031 · Cited by 781
Recent advances in genetics, diagnosis, localization, and treatment of pheochromocytoma
Pacak, K., Linehan, W. M., Eisenhofer, G., Walther, M. M., & Goldstein, D. S. (2001) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-134-4-200102200-00016 · Cited by 618
Self-citationAssalia, A., & Gagner, M. (2004) · British Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.4738 · Cited by 308
Transperitoneal laparoscopic adrenalectomy: experience in 72 procedures
Porpiglia, F., Garrone, C., Giraudo, G., Destefanis, P., Fontana, D., & Morino, M. (2001) · Journal of Endourology · doi:10.1089/089277901750161755 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Vargas, H. I., Kavoussi, L. R., Bartlett, D. L., Wagner, J. R., Venzon, D. J., Fraker, D. L., Richard Alexander, H., Marston Linehan, W., & Walther, M. M.
- Venue
- Urology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1997-05
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 673-678
- ISSN
- 0090-4295 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100928008
- Cited by
- 181
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A new standard of care. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00083-6
- The paper
- Vargas, H. I., Kavoussi, L. R., Bartlett, D. L., Wagner, J. R., Venzon, D. J., Fraker, D. L., Richard Alexander, H., Marston Linehan, W., & Walther, M. M. (1997). Laparoscopic adrenalectomy: A new standard of care. Urology. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00083-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.