Cited by 56Diabetes Management and ResearchVeterinary Pharmacology and AnesthesiaDiabetes Treatment and Management

Pharmacokinetics of the Rapid-Acting Insulin Analog, Insulin Aspart, in Rats, Dogs, and Pigs, and Pharmacodynamics of Insulin Aspart in Pigs

Plum, Anne, Agersø, Henrik, Andersen, Lennart·2000·Drug Metabolism and Disposition

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin aspart (IA), a rapidly acting insulin analog, with those of human soluble (regular) insulin (HI) in animal models after s.c. and i.v. dosing. Single doses of IA and HI were administered i.v. and s.c. to rats and dogs at three dose levels, and at one dose level to pigs; rats and dogs also underwent repeated s.c. dosing for 1 week. Plasma insulin levels were assessed at predetermined time points after dosing; plasma glucose levels were measured in pigs only. There were no significant pharmacokinetic differences between IA and HI after a single s.c. or i.v. dose in rats or dogs, and no differences were observed after repeated s.c. dosing, implying there was no accumulation. In pigs, there was a strong trend toward more rapid absorption of IA compared with HI after s.c. dosing, whereas there were no differences after i.v. administration. After s.c. dosing in pigs, IA produced significantly lower plasma glucose levels compared with HI during the period 30 to 75 min after dosing (P <.05). In conclusion, IA was more rapidly absorbed than HI after s.c. administration only in the pig; this difference was reflected in earlier and more pronounced effects on plasma glucose levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0090-9556(24)15122-7

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Plum, A., Agersø, H., & Andersen, L.
Affiliations
Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
Corresponding author
Plum, Anne
Venue
Drug Metabolism and Disposition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-02
Volume
28
Issue
2
Pages
155-160
ISSN
0090-9556 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2245370565
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Drug Metabolism and Disposition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
insulin aspart, rapid-acting insulin analogs, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, subcutaneous administration, intravenous administration, plasma insulin, plasma glucose, subcutaneous absorption, cross-species comparison, rats, dogs, pigs
MeSH terms
Animals, Blood Glucose, Dogs, Female, Half-Life, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Intravenous, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Male, Species Specificity, Swine, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Area Under Curve, Rats, Insulin Aspart

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review