Cited by 204Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerGene Regulatory Network Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Interpretation of Position in a Morphogen Gradient as Revealed by Occupancy of Activin Receptors

Open access

Abstract

Xenopus blastula cells activate different mesodermal genes as a concentration-dependent response to activin, which behaves like a morphogen. To understand how cells recognize morphogen concentration, we have bound naturally labeled activin to cells and related this to choice of gene activation. We find that the increasing occupancy of a single receptor type can cause cells to switch gene expression. Cells sense ligand concentration by the absolute number of occupied receptors per cell (100 and 300 molecules of bound activin induce Xbra and Xgsc, respectively, i.e., 2% and 6% of the total receptors) and not by a ratio of occupied to unoccupied receptors. The long duration of occupancy explains a previously described ratchet effect. Our results suggest a new concept of morphogen gradient formation and interpretation that is particularly well suited to the needs of early development.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81185-x

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gurdon, 1976, Injected nuclei in frog oocytes, J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol., 36, 523
  2. Koenig, 1996, Intracellular trafficking of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor, Mol. Pharmacol., 49, 351

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 203

Metadata

Authors
Dyson, S., & Gurdon, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Gurdon, J.B
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-05
Volume
93
Issue
4
Pages
557-568
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2110126772
Cited by
204
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 3
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
Keywords
activin, morphogen gradients, receptor occupancy, Xbra, ratchet effect, gene expression switching, early embryonic development
MeSH terms
Brachyury Protein, Animals, Blastocyst, DNA-Binding Proteins, Fetal Proteins, Inhibins, Ligands, Oligopeptides, Oocytes, Peptides, Repressor Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Transcription Factors, Xenopus, Signal Transduction, Transcriptional Activation, Receptors, Growth Factor, Homeodomain Proteins, Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental, T-Box Domain Proteins, Activins, Activin Receptors, Goosecoid Protein

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review