Cited by 274Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationMuscle Physiology and DisordersGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Myogenesis: A View from Drosophila

Open access
Baylies, Mary K, Bate, Michael, Gomez, Mar Ruiz·1998·Cell

Abstract

It may be apocryphal but there is a widely held belief among fly enthusiasts that the Drosophila larva has more muscles than a human being. Of course, it all depends on how you count the muscles, but it is undeniable that the Drosophila larva equips itself with a remarkably complex muscle pattern (Bate 1993; Abmayr et al. 1995). This pattern originates during a brief period of early development when the embryonic fly first subdivides its mesoderm into the progenitors of different internal structures and, thereafter, in a remarkable process whereby individual muscles are seeded and specified from the cells of the myogenic lineage. Recent work has fleshed out details of both these processes and reveals similarities and differences in the development of the muscles of flies and vertebrates. Like vertebrate embryos, flies divide their mesoderm into segmental units and the diversification of these units is influenced by signals such as TGFβ, Wnt, and Hh family members (Bate 1993; Lawrence et al. 1995; Wu et al. 1995; Azpiazu et al. 1996; Bate and Baylies 1996; Tajbakhsh and Cossu 1997). Myogenic lineages arise from these segmental units, and genes coding for components of the myogenic pathways have been remarkably conserved in many instances. However, there appear to be differences in the way in which these elements are deployed in flies and vertebrates. These differences may reflect a real divergence in the development of the musculature in two widely separated groups of animals, or alternatively, and perhaps more interestingly, they may represent variations in a common program that is, as yet, incompletely understood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81198-8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Drosophila and vertebrates, Twist and Snail family members are needed for mesoderm specification and cooperate with Mef2 and MyoD family members during myogenesis.

    “In Drosophila and vertebrates, Twist (Cripps et al., 1998) and Snail (Hemavathy et al., 2000;Manazanares et al., 2001) family members are required for mesoderm specification and act together with the Mef2 and MyoD (Baylies et al., 1998) family members in myogenesis.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baylies, M. K., Bate, M., & Gomez, M. R.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Baylies, Mary K
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1998-06
Volume
93
Issue
6
Pages
921-927
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020708064
Cited by
274
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Muscle Physiology and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
myogenesis, Drosophila larvae, myogenic lineage, TGF-beta signaling, Wnt signaling, Hedgehog signaling
MeSH terms
Animals, Drosophila, Mesoderm, Morphogenesis, Muscles, Body Patterning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review